2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.05.935817
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of healthy aging on change detection and sensitivity to predictable sturcture in crowded acoustic scenes

Abstract: Acknowledgments: This project was supported by a PhD studentship from Action on Hearing Loss and a BBSRC project grant (BB/P003745/1) to MC. DV is supported by Medical Research Senior Fellowship (MR/S002537/1). We are grateful to Brian Moore and Stuart Rosen for advice and discussion. The auditory system plays a critical role in supporting our ability to detect abrupt changes in our surroundings. Here we study how this capacity is affected in the course of healthy ageing. Artifical acoustic 'scenes', populated… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 77 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study, however, suggested that elderly listeners can utilize predictability, albeit with a high degree of inter-individual variation(37). Further, de Kerangal and colleagues (41)also found that the ability to track sound sources based on acoustic regularities is largely preserved in old age. The current results strengthen this view, as figures within the tone clouds are detected by their temporally coherent behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A recent study, however, suggested that elderly listeners can utilize predictability, albeit with a high degree of inter-individual variation(37). Further, de Kerangal and colleagues (41)also found that the ability to track sound sources based on acoustic regularities is largely preserved in old age. The current results strengthen this view, as figures within the tone clouds are detected by their temporally coherent behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%