2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00766g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of heat treatment on the anatase–rutile phase transformation and photocatalytic activity of Sn-doped TiO2 nanomaterials

Abstract: Sn incorporation into TiO2 lattices promotes anatase/rutile transformation and Sn–TiO2 exhibits better photocatalytic activity at different temperatures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For a higher coverage of 0.05 ML Sn, peaks for both metallic Sn at 484.8 eV and SnO x at 487.3 eV are observed with roughly equal intensities. The 484.8 eV binding energy is in agreement with the 484.5–485.2 eV values reported for metallic Sn. ,− The value of 487.3 eV is higher than the ∼486.0–486.6 eV ,,, assigned to Sn 4+ in bulk SnO 2 , but clusters ,,,, and thin films , generally have higher binding energies than bulk SnO 2 and have been observed at ∼487 eV. Given the similarities between the Sn 2+ and Sn 4+ binding energies in oxides, especially in cases where the structure of SnO x is not well-defined, it is difficult to distinguish between SnO 2 and SnO. ,,, Due to the small signals that we observe for the low Sn coverages, the use of the Auger parameter , is also not a reliable method of distinction between SnO and SnO 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a higher coverage of 0.05 ML Sn, peaks for both metallic Sn at 484.8 eV and SnO x at 487.3 eV are observed with roughly equal intensities. The 484.8 eV binding energy is in agreement with the 484.5–485.2 eV values reported for metallic Sn. ,− The value of 487.3 eV is higher than the ∼486.0–486.6 eV ,,, assigned to Sn 4+ in bulk SnO 2 , but clusters ,,,, and thin films , generally have higher binding energies than bulk SnO 2 and have been observed at ∼487 eV. Given the similarities between the Sn 2+ and Sn 4+ binding energies in oxides, especially in cases where the structure of SnO x is not well-defined, it is difficult to distinguish between SnO 2 and SnO. ,,, Due to the small signals that we observe for the low Sn coverages, the use of the Auger parameter , is also not a reliable method of distinction between SnO and SnO 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Sn 4+ can be easily substituted for Ti 4+ in rutile TiO 2 , and the resulting materials are believed to possess superior chemical, optical, and electronic properties. For applications involving solar cells, doping TiO 2 with Sn 4+ improves performance by decreasing the band gap . Sn-doped TiO 2 also exhibits excellent photocatalytic activity for reactions such as photodegradation of dyes , and photo-oxidation of NO x 19 and organics; this improved photoactivity is attributed to a decrease in the rate of electron–hole recombination and improved light absorption after Sn 4+ doping. , For TiO 2 used in the anodes of Li-ion batteries, better power, capacity, and stability are reported after Sn doping. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of DRS analysis for silica microfibers grafted with nanotitania highlighted a band gap of 3.37 eV. Such band gap values could be associated with the crystalline characteristics of the material 44,45 (2020) 10:136 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56836-7…”
Section: Uv-vis-drs Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The broad exothermic peak is observed at a temperature range of 200 to 500 with less intensity, which may reflect the combustion of residual organic matter (auto-ignition temp. of EAcAc = 295°C), also, the crystallization of the anatase and rutile phases in the particles, and the phase transformation of the anatase to the rutile phase [17]. According to the DTA analysis results, temperatures of 350, 450, 550, and 650°C were selected as the sample calcination temperature.…”
Section: Tg-dta Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%