1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3765(19990104)5:1<297::aid-chem297>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of High Pressure on the Diastereoselectivity of Intermolecular All-Carbon Diels-Alder Reactions

Abstract: The influence of high pressure on the diastereoselectivity of the intermolecular all-carbon Diels ± Alder reaction of the phenylbutadienes 1 a ± c with the dicyanoethylenes 2 a ± d to give the cyclohexenes 3 ± 8 is described. The differences in activation volume, DDV = , for the two pathways leading to cis and trans diastereomers range from À (0.7 AE 0.8) to À (6.4 AE 0.6) cm 3 mol À1, indicating a pressure-induced increase of diastereoselectivity in favour of the cis adducts 3 a ± d, 5 a ± d and 7 b ± d.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the more compact endo approach is favored by a HPs. 2,19,20 In some cases endo kinetic adducts are obtained under hyperbaric cycloaddition, while exo thermodynamic ones are generated by heating. 21 The activation observed in organic reactions in liquid phase is explained by the Evans-Polanyi equation, which connects a negative activation volume with the acceleration of the reaction with pressure increase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the more compact endo approach is favored by a HPs. 2,19,20 In some cases endo kinetic adducts are obtained under hyperbaric cycloaddition, while exo thermodynamic ones are generated by heating. 21 The activation observed in organic reactions in liquid phase is explained by the Evans-Polanyi equation, which connects a negative activation volume with the acceleration of the reaction with pressure increase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step-1: 14 Yield: 86%; colorless oil; R f = 0.3 (10% EtOAc/hexanes); 1 H NMR (300 MHz, 1H), 6.50 (d,J = 15.8 Hz,1H), 6.15 (dd,J = 6.7,15.8 Hz,1H),4.12 (q,J = 6.7 Hz,1H), 2.88 (br s, 1H), 1.68-1.53 (m, 2H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H); 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 136. 6,132.1,130.0,128.3,127.3,126.2,74.0,29.9,9.5;IR (neat):  max 3393,3025,2967,1609,1495,963,747,690 Step-2: 15 Yield: 85%; colorless oil; R f = 0.5 (10% EtOAc/hexanes); 1 H NMR (500 MHz, 199.9,141.4,129.7,128.3,127.6,125.4,33.3,7.5;IR (neat):  max 2977, 1663,1611,1494,1352,1187,1119,978,745,690…”
Section: (E)-1-phenylpent-1-en-3-one (4aa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step-2: Yield: 76%; colorless oil; R f = 0.5 (10% EtOAc/hexanes); 1 H NMR (300 MHz, 7, 158.0, 149.9, 134.3, 130.0, 129.1, 127.3, 113.6, 54.9, 54.8, 16 42.9,28.1,21.7,11.2;IR (neat):  max 2959,1663,1510,1459,1242,1177,1036,824,670 cm -1 ; HRMS (ESI): calcd for C 15 Step-2: Yield: 82%; colorless oil; R f = 0.5 (10% EtOAc/hexanes); 1 H NMR (300 MHz, 7,149.6,134.3,131.9,117.5,42.1,28.1,21.7,11.0;IR (neat) 6,159.6,137.9,135.0,131.3,128.3,113.7,55.1,30.4,13.0,8.8;IR (neat): 2934,1661,1602,1509,1252,1176,1031,829 7,148.4,134.4,30.1,28.0,21.8,11.1,8.7;IR (neat)…”
Section: (E)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-35-dimethylhex-3-en-2-one (4l)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTIR (cm -1 ): 2961 (s), 2874 (m), 1676 (s), 1632 (m), 1464 (w), 1188 *w), 1045 (w), 980 (m). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 6.81 (1H, dt, J = 16.0, 7.0 Hz, HC=CHCO), 6.08 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, HC=CHCO), 2.52 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, COCH 2 ), 2.18 (2H, dd, J = 14.5, 7.0 Hz, CH 2 CH=C), 1.58 (tt, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, COCH 2 CH 2 ), 1.49 (tq, J = 7.0, 7.0 Hz, HC=CHCH 2 CH 2 CH 3 ), 1.32 (tq, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 3 ), 0.93 (3H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, COCH 2 CH 2 CH 3 ), 0.90 (3H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, CH 2 CH 2 CH 3 ). 13 Diethyl (2-oxopropyl)phosphonate (4.04 mL, 20.1 mmol, 1.05 equiv.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product: FTIR (cm -1 ): 2967 (m), 2874 (w), 2247 (w), 1676 (s), 1626 (m), 1362 (m), 1258 (m), 988 (m). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 6.65 (1H, dt, J = 16.5 Hz, HC=CHCO), 6.02 (1H, d, J = 16.5 Hz, HC=CHCO), 2.27 (3H, s, COCH 3 ), 2.23 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, CH 2 CN), 1.18 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, CH 2 C(CH 3 ) 2 ), 1.12 (6H, s, C(CH 3 ) 2 ). 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 198.6, 153.9, 129.0, 119.9, 37.6, 36.8, 27.7, 26.2, 13.2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%