Many central vascular catheters (CVCs) are removed unnecessarily because current diagnostic methods for CVC-associated infection are unreliable. A quantitative PCR assay using primers and probe targeted to bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA was used to measure the levels of bacterial DNA in blood samples drawn through the CVC in a population of patients receiving intravenous nutrition. Bacterial DNA concentrations were raised in 16 of 16 blood samples taken during episodes of probable bacterial CVC-associated infection. Bacterial DNA concentrations were raised in 4 of 29 episodes in which bacterial CVC-associated infection was unlikely. The use of this technique has the potential to substantially reduce the unnecessary removal of CVCs.In many patient populations, central vascular catheters (CVCs) are routinely used for the administration of drugs, fluids, or intravenous feeding solutions. CVCs are a major risk factor for bloodstream infections. The majority of hospitalacquired bloodstream infections are associated with the use of a CVC (3). These infections are associated with considerable costs for patients and health providers.CVC infection is caused predominantly by bacteria, particularly staphylococci, with a small proportion of infections being attributable to fungi. Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of CVC-associated bacteremia. CVC infections caused by S. epidermidis can often be effectively treated with antibiotics infused through or locked in to the CVC (4, 15). Many of the other bacterial and fungal causes of infection respond poorly to antibiotic therapy alone, and patient outcome is improved by removal of the CVC.Traditional methods of diagnosis of CVC-associated infection rely on clinical features and quantitative microbiology of blood samples (15) or on methods that can only be applied following CVC removal. The clinical features of CVC infection may be nonspecific, particularly in patients undergoing intensive care or in patients who are immunocompromised. A number of novel methods for the diagnosis of CVC infection have been proposed (1, 2, 4, 7-10). These methods have not been widely adopted, either because of poor performance in some groups of patients, such as those on antibiotics, or because of a requirement for invasive sampling of the CVC. Blot et al. (2) described a method that compared the differential times to positivity, as determined by a continuous automated blood culture monitoring system which compares the growth rates of organisms in blood collected from the catheter and a peripheral vein. Another method involves culture from the terminal 4-cm segment of the cannula, which is rolled over the entire surface of an agar plate five times, and counting of the resultant colonies (9, 12). However, interpreting the significance of the resultant growth may be problematic (9). In addition, quantitative microbiology is unreliable for patients exposed to antibiotics, so even with appropriate use of diagnostic methods there often remains considerable diagnostic uncertainty. As a resu...