2016
DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v32i4.9727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect Of Humble Leader Behavior, Leader Expertise, And Organizational Identification On Employee Turnover Intention

Abstract: As

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
30
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a humble project manager represents a common conceptual construct of those with the knowledge and experience to build a collaborative, enthusiastic environment for the team (Walters and Diab, 2016;Ou et al, 2016), which helps subordinates to identify and attain project objectives. Second, a humble project manager supports to improve the significance of the team members by assisting an individual in realizing the value of his/her job role that enables the employees to understand the role clarification and has an effect on organizational results (Li et al, 2016;McElroy et al, 2014;Day et al, 2004;Reinholt et al, 2011). Third, a humble project manager who asks team members for suggestions eliminates bureaucratic constraints and strengthens his/her followers (Chiu et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2018), which is highly connected to the self-efficacy component of psychological empowerment.…”
Section: The Mediating Role Of Psychological Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a humble project manager represents a common conceptual construct of those with the knowledge and experience to build a collaborative, enthusiastic environment for the team (Walters and Diab, 2016;Ou et al, 2016), which helps subordinates to identify and attain project objectives. Second, a humble project manager supports to improve the significance of the team members by assisting an individual in realizing the value of his/her job role that enables the employees to understand the role clarification and has an effect on organizational results (Li et al, 2016;McElroy et al, 2014;Day et al, 2004;Reinholt et al, 2011). Third, a humble project manager who asks team members for suggestions eliminates bureaucratic constraints and strengthens his/her followers (Chiu et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2018), which is highly connected to the self-efficacy component of psychological empowerment.…”
Section: The Mediating Role Of Psychological Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluid teams may have more difficulty coordinating and, subsequently, performing effectively if individual team members fail to express when they are uncertain about a task (Gillespie et al, 2013). In the case of member replacement, the similarity between the joining and leaving team members is likely to reduce the novelty and disruptiveness of the event (Li et al, 2016). Incoming and outgoing team members with similar task knowledge (Levine & Choi, 2004; Li et al, 2016), functional backgrounds (Li & Gevers, 2018), superordinate identities (Kane, 2010; Kane et al, 2005), and cognitive ability (Summers et al, 2012) are more likely to produce favorable team outcomes following the replacement event.…”
Section: Review and Synthesis Of Extant Research On Team Membership Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of member replacement, the similarity between the joining and leaving team members is likely to reduce the novelty and disruptiveness of the event (Li et al, 2016). Incoming and outgoing team members with similar task knowledge (Levine & Choi, 2004; Li et al, 2016), functional backgrounds (Li & Gevers, 2018), superordinate identities (Kane, 2010; Kane et al, 2005), and cognitive ability (Summers et al, 2012) are more likely to produce favorable team outcomes following the replacement event. Interestingly, even if the incoming and departing team members are not similar, the replacement event may lead them to be perceived as more similar by the team.…”
Section: Review and Synthesis Of Extant Research On Team Membership Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to our hypothesized moderating effects, moderated regression analysis was used to test our H5-H8 (see Table IV ). As suggested by the literature (Li et al, 2016;Lu et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2016), this study included gender, age, tenure, education, marriage status, and work mood as control variables in the analysis. The test results in Models 1 and 2 are simultaneously examined in order to elaborate upon the analytic results of the hypotheses.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%