Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Software and E-Business 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3301761.3301774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Icon Size and Grid Size on Smartphone Menu Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Icon 2.0 era, research on icons has become more extensive due to the introduction of touch technology and mobile devices, such as icon size, 5,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] border shapes [19][20][21][22] and color schemes. 20,21,[23][24][25] Of which, research related to icon size has focused on operational performance, that were, selection speed and accuracy.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Icon 2.0 era, research on icons has become more extensive due to the introduction of touch technology and mobile devices, such as icon size, 5,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] border shapes [19][20][21][22] and color schemes. 20,21,[23][24][25] Of which, research related to icon size has focused on operational performance, that were, selection speed and accuracy.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second study investigated icon size and grid size on the speed of menu selection on a smartphone [13]. These authors used 32 experiment design (grid size (34, 33, and 23) and icon size (4848 pixels and 6060 pixels), with a sample of 30 students.…”
Section: ) Icon Size and Selection Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have indicated that grid size and pictogram spacing affect search performance. Tadayin et al (2018) determined that a grid size of 3 × 4 is the most efficient grid size in menu selection. They observed a significant difference in the search performance achieved with grid sizes 2 × 3 and 3 × 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%