The effect of image quality, repeated study, and assessment method on anatomy learning

Abstract

The use of two-dimensional (2D) images is consistently used to prepare anatomy students for handling real specimen. This study examined whether the quality of 2D images is a critical component in anatomy learning. The visual clarity and consistency of 2D anatomical images was systematically manipulated to produce low-quality and high-quality images of the human hand and human eye. On day 0, participants learned about each anatomical specimen from paper booklets using either low-quality or high-quality images, and then completed a comprehension test using either 2D images or three-dimensional (3D) cadaveric specimens. On day 1, participants relearned each booklet, and on day 2 participants completed a final comprehension test using either 2D images or 3D cadaveric specimens. The effect of image quality on learning varied according to anatomical content, with high-quality images having a greater effect on improving learning of hand anatomy than eye anatomy (high-quality vs. low-quality for hand anatomy P = 0.018; high-quality vs. low-quality for eye anatomy P = 0.247). Also, the benefit of high-quality images on hand anatomy learning was restricted to performance on short-answer (SA) questions immediately after learning (high-quality vs. low-quality on SA questions P = 0.018), but did not apply to performance on multiple-choice (MC) questions (high-quality vs. low-quality on MC questions P = 0.109) or after participants had an additional learning opportunity (24 hours later) with anatomy content (high vs. low on SA questions P = 0.643). This study underscores the limited impact of image quality on anatomy learning, and questions whether investment in enhancing image quality of learning aids significantly promotes knowledge development. Anat Sci Educ 10: 249-261. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.

The impact of using an “anatomy escape room” on nursing students: A comparative study

“…In this vein, Estai and Bunt (2016) found that the importance of teaching modern anatomy is to use a wide selection of pedagogical methods, though more research is needed to investigate this transition to new methodologies. Game-based teaching models that use both visual and auditory stimuli to benefit different learning styles while also encouraging group discussion and participation are among the most recent approaches used (Gallegos et al, 2017), whereas others such as an interactive atlas (Guy et al, 2018), virtual reality (Fenesi et al, 2016;Moro et al, 2017) or even comics (Kim et al, 2017) are also used.…”

Detailed Images for Sustainability Development in Cross-Sectional Human Anatomy

“…The contemporary educational system includes skills and competences that are required for modern economy (Jirgensons & Kapenieks, 2018). New technologies play a very important and powerful role in all areas of human activities (Fenesi, Mackinnon, Cheng, Kim, & Wainman, 2017). It is clear that they comprise and/or transform different spheres of medicine and medical education (Starkey, 2012).…”

Effects of image‐based and text‐based active learning exercises on student examination performance in a musculoskeletal anatomy course

“…Butcher () directly addressed the issue of image complexity for learning, and demonstrated strong support for the benefit of simpler diagrams designed to highlight the representation of critical relationships, particularly for low knowledge learners. At a given level of image complexity, Fenesi et al () found that image quality itself seemed to have only a limited effect on anatomy learning, and the advantage of higher quality images did not apply with additional learning opportunities. The images in the active learning exercises used in this study varied in complexity, from schematic representations to radiological images; if the images had been systematically ordered by complexity or fidelity, or had been designed specifically to represent spatial or conceptual relationships, it is possible that the positive effect of the image‐based active learning exercises might have been even stronger.…”