1994
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1994.sp003784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of immobilization on the recovery of rabbit soleus muscle from tenotomy: modulation by chronic electrical stimulation

Abstract: SUMMARYThe effect of unilateral Achilles' tendon section on the soleus muscle of rabbits was examined after 2 and 4 weeks of unsutured recovery. Immobilization of the limb during recovery was also investigated. Following tendon section the limb was immobilized with an ankle angle of 90 deg, and final experiments were performed either after 2 weeks, or after the splints were removed and a further 2 weeks recovery allowed. Remobilized recovery was either allowed to occur naturally or with chronic low-frequency e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, they compared the effect of natural recovery from immobilization, followed by natural recovery augmented by electrical stimulation using implanted electrodes attached to a mini-stimulator. 10 In their immobilization groups, they confirmed similar myopathic changes seen with tenotomy, demonstrating decreased fiber area, decreased fiber occupancy per field, increased numbers of transitional and fast fibers, decreased tetanic tension, and increased rate of contraction and relaxation. The time of total immobilization was directly correlated with the degree of the above changes.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, they compared the effect of natural recovery from immobilization, followed by natural recovery augmented by electrical stimulation using implanted electrodes attached to a mini-stimulator. 10 In their immobilization groups, they confirmed similar myopathic changes seen with tenotomy, demonstrating decreased fiber area, decreased fiber occupancy per field, increased numbers of transitional and fast fibers, decreased tetanic tension, and increased rate of contraction and relaxation. The time of total immobilization was directly correlated with the degree of the above changes.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…8 In contrast to the relatively rapid response of the rat soleus muscle, atropy of the rabbit soleus muscle does not reach a significant level until 4 weeks posttenotomy. 10 In the rabbit model, reformation of a distal attachment of the muscle to either the tendon stump or surrounding connective tissue with subsequent application of tension decreases atrophy and improves maximum tension production, a measure of muscle strength. 65,66 Tenotomy, with intact innervation, leads to several changes in muscle contractile function.…”
Section: Tenotomy Decreases Muscle Mass and Force-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this period, the soleus is presumably under tension and this stimulates the slowtwitch phenotype as well as sarcomere addition. After 2 weeks, the muscle has lengthened by sarcomere addition and further immobilization at neutral induces muscle atrophy (see Cotter et al 1986Cotter et al , 1988Cotter et al , 1991Barry et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vrbová (1980) has described the time course for changes in muscle phenotype to be in the order of 3 to 6 weeks, beginning with an alteration in muscle vascularization and ending with a transformation of the myosin ATPase properties of the muscle fibres. Changes in the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium-uptake mechanism are thought to mediate the rapid relaxation phase of tenotomized and immobilized muscles over a 2-to 4-week period (Barry et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com relação à plasticidade muscular esquelética, esta tem sido investigada em diferentes situações, tais como: tenotomia do calcâneo (HNÍK et al, 1963;HNÍK, 1964;KARPATI;EISEN, 1972;BAKER;HALL-CRAGGS, 1980;BAKER;MARGOLIS 1987;JÓZSA et al, 1988;JÓZSA et al, 1990;JAKUBIEC-PUKA et al, 1992;HENRIKSEN;JACOBSEN, 1994, TROOP et al, 1995JAMALI et al, 2000 (JÓZSA et al, 1988;JÓZSA et al, 1990;BARRY et al, 1994;MAYER, 2008), estimulação elétrica (SIMONEAU; PETTE, Entretanto, ainda que a inervação e outras influências extrínsecas, como hormônios, possam modular o tipo de fibra muscular, os efeitos parecem ser limitados por diferentes fatores intrínsecos próprios das fibras musculares (HUGHES; BLAU, 1992).…”
Section: Plasticidade Do Músculo Esqueléticounclassified