1991
DOI: 10.1149/1.2085768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Inhibitor Transport on Leveling in Electrodeposition

Abstract: The electrodeposition of nickel into an angular trench in the presence of coumarin, a widely used inhibitor, is simulated using boundary layer approximations representative of flow parallel and transverse to the groove. Based on the diffusion-adsorption mechanism of leveling action, the dependence of the developing contours on variations in the Langmuir coefficient and inhibitor/metal-ion flux ratio are investigated. Leveling efficiency is shown to be highest for thin, planar boundary layers, and lowest for co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent coverage remains relatively constant in a fairly wide range of potential and nearly independent of the electrode rotation speed. The average value of the surface coverage of PEG is around 97%, which is in good agreement with Kelly and West's results 16 and the CVS measurements ͑Fig. 3͒.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The apparent coverage remains relatively constant in a fairly wide range of potential and nearly independent of the electrode rotation speed. The average value of the surface coverage of PEG is around 97%, which is in good agreement with Kelly and West's results 16 and the CVS measurements ͑Fig. 3͒.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[12][13][14][15] Nevertheless, superfilling by accelerator alone cannot be explained under the framework of established leveling theories, which require that deposition rate ͑at a constant applied potential͒ in a leveling bath should decrease as the rotation speed of an RDE increases. 11,16,17 Figure 6 demonstrates that the opposite trend is observed. 2.…”
Section: Wafer Typementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The leveling mechanism of coumarin, as a typical leveler, was extensively studied [48,49,[55][56][57][58][59]. Coumarin inhibits electrochemical deposition by adsorbing on depositing sites and thus reducing the area available for electrodeposition.…”
Section: Effects Of Additive Coumarinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in previous models of adsorbate incorporation during electrodeposition, 8,18 the incorporation rate in Eq. 1 is proportional to the adsorbate coverage and the deposition current density.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%