2002
DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300060801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Initial Graft Tension in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on the Mechanical Behaviors of the Femur-Graft-Tibia Complex during Cyclic Loading

Abstract: Considering the tension of the normal anterior cruciate ligament (16 to 87 N), an initial tension of 20 N appears to be high enough for a patellar tendon graft. For a flexor tendon graft with interference screws, an increase in initial tension above 80 N has no biomechanical advantages.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 This should be taken into account, independent of the type of fixation device. 25 For tibial internal rotation torque, the anatomic doublebundle reconstruction restored the tibial rotation of the ACL to the level of the intact knee, whereas the singlebundle reconstruction did not: cutting the ACL increased the laxity by a mean of 4°at 20°of knee flexion, the single-bundle reconstruction only reduced this by a mean of 1°while the double-bundle reconstruction reduced it by a mean of 3.5°. Because the single-bundle reconstruction approximated the AM bundle, the graft was more vertical than the PL bundle of the ACL so it could not effectively stabilize knee rotation near the full extension position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 This should be taken into account, independent of the type of fixation device. 25 For tibial internal rotation torque, the anatomic doublebundle reconstruction restored the tibial rotation of the ACL to the level of the intact knee, whereas the singlebundle reconstruction did not: cutting the ACL increased the laxity by a mean of 4°at 20°of knee flexion, the single-bundle reconstruction only reduced this by a mean of 1°while the double-bundle reconstruction reduced it by a mean of 3.5°. Because the single-bundle reconstruction approximated the AM bundle, the graft was more vertical than the PL bundle of the ACL so it could not effectively stabilize knee rotation near the full extension position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, the conclusions reached refer to time-zero conditions and may be influenced subsequently by the effects of chronic graft relaxation and graft remodeling, which have been demonstrated to affect the fate of ACL reconstruction. 25 These limitations have been offset by the ability to make a series of comparative intraspecimen tests on a range of ACL reconstruction protocols. Further, the test setup allowed carefully controlled loads to be applied and full 6 degrees of freedom kinematic data to be collected by motion sensors attached directly to the bones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having an interference screw in place effectively shortens the tendon construct by not allowing the tendon length inside the bone tunnel to stretch when loaded. By preventing this section of the tendon from stretching, laxity due to inadequate initial graft tensioning becomes less pronounced [9]. The screw also mitigates stretching of the EndoButton loop, which is another factor in increasing construct stiffness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graft load in the button-fixation technique was low, probably due to slight slippage of the button. When the graft was fixed under maximum manual tension, the graft loads at completion of fixation for the interference fit screw, fixation post, and button techniques were the effect of fixation method on residual load of the ACL graft [5,19,21], and its significance has not been clarified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%