2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of innovation activities on innovation outputs in the Brazilian industry: Market-orientation vs. technology-acquisition strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
142
4
37

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
8
142
4
37
Order By: Relevance
“…First, because a large number of firms that conduct disembodied TI activities also conducted embodied TI. Second, embodied TI activities are commonplace among the innovative firms in Uruguay (Bianchi et al, 2015) and in other developed and developing countries (Frank et al, 2016;Ballot et al, 2015). Therefore, the analysis of firm that conduct only embodied TI activities may reflect the idiosyncratic innovative behaviour of a specific number of firms rather than an innovative pattern.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, because a large number of firms that conduct disembodied TI activities also conducted embodied TI. Second, embodied TI activities are commonplace among the innovative firms in Uruguay (Bianchi et al, 2015) and in other developed and developing countries (Frank et al, 2016;Ballot et al, 2015). Therefore, the analysis of firm that conduct only embodied TI activities may reflect the idiosyncratic innovative behaviour of a specific number of firms rather than an innovative pattern.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But as suppliers acquire the abilities to handle the entire working process, asymmetry in power and control between global and local actors may operate as a barrier to the development of local competitiveness in the sphere of design, marketing, and branding, which are typically considered the core competencies of global lead firms. Related to this argument, recent studies observed that knowledge transfers flowing from interaction with MNCs tend to be confined to the sphere of production, mostly localizing efforts of innovation outcomes produced in first-world economies [43]. Thus, to ensure the sustainability of industrial strategies through participation in GPNs, developing countries should focus on how to avoid being locked into quasi-hierarchical value chain governance and translate 'organizational succession' into reality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, Brazil stands out in general for maintaining low investments in R&D; economic and political volatility; high levels of corruption; decline in recognition of the number of workers in slave condition; low quality of education, low capacity of industries to generate innovation, often transferred from foreign sources and financial constraints. Another disadvantage is the percentage of GDP invested in R&D that is below 1.2%, while EU countries invest over 2% and OECD members above 2.5% (FRANK et al, 2016).…”
Section: Innovation In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Innovation System has evolved in recent years between 1980 and 2008, with increased investments in R&D, increased intellectual property, implementation of policy instruments that support innovation, improvement in education, improvement in the performance of Science and Technology institutions (S&T) in terms of publications, visibility and innovation; institutional support to more structured innovation and development modalities being created by the Financier of Studies and Projects (FINEP -in Portuguese), or by the National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES -in Portuguese) (FRANK et al, 2016 According to the FINEP website, it was create in July 1967 to finance the preparation of studies for economic development projects and programs, as well as to improve national technology. With the creation of the then Ministry of Science and Technology (MCT), in March 1985, FINEP became associated with it.…”
Section: Innovation In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%