2019
DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2019.1573958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of innovation practices on agribusiness performance: A structural equation modelling (SEM) approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Common measurement methods include data envelopment analysis (DEA) [30,31], the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, factor analysis [32], principal component analysis [33], analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy weight, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and grey correlation analysis. For example, Li et al [34] analyzed regional innovation and green economy efficiency based on DEA and fuzzy evaluation methods.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Green Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Common measurement methods include data envelopment analysis (DEA) [30,31], the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, factor analysis [32], principal component analysis [33], analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy weight, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and grey correlation analysis. For example, Li et al [34] analyzed regional innovation and green economy efficiency based on DEA and fuzzy evaluation methods.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Green Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic, environmental, and social factors [25][26][27] Method DEA, AHP, entropy, TOPSIS, etc. [30][31][32][33] The above methods often inevitably lead to experts' subjective judgment and unreasonable weight distribution, and ignore the randomness and fuzziness of evaluation information.…”
Section: Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actors believe that the technology they are about to employ will help them improve their performance because of its perceived utility. Agribusiness enterprises believe that any innovation activity that lowers productivity and income is incompatible with their operations (Ntiamoah et al, 2019). In this study, internal factors include PU; perceived usefulness, OC; organizational culture, PI; personal innovation, PE; farmers prior experience, and C; compatibility, as determined by vast literature.…”
Section: Internal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies, Ghanaian agribusinesses have not completely realized their potential because they have not been able to innovate agricultural technology quickly enough to keep up with improvements in agricultural development knowledge (Abban et al, 2014;Bosompem et al, 2017;Ntiamoah et al, 2019). The research of Vlachopoulou et al (2021) has revealed that agribusinesses should be trained and equipped with the latest tools and technologies in order to improve their productivity and profitability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies according to Spithoven, Bart, and Mirjam (2010) have conducted research into the relationship between innovation and enterprise"s performance. Based on the review of Ntiamoah, Li, and Sarpong (2019) it was discovered that the attention of some empirical studies was majorly on the relationship between the dimensions (product, process, organizational and marketing innovation) of innovation and performance. Several studies (such as (Bakar & Ahmad, 2010); (Chong, Chan, Ooi, & Sim, 2011); (Njogu, 2014); (Olughor, 2015); (Gu & Shao, 2015); (Ndesaulwa & Kikula, 2016); (Canh, Liem, Thu, & Khuong, 2019)) are aware of the significance of innovation and have conducted an empirical investigation to unveil the impact of innovation on enterprise"s performance.…”
Section: Authormentioning
confidence: 99%