2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of inter-laboratory variability on the protein:creatinine (UPC) ratio in canine urine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, the influence of storage and dilution of urine samples has been investigated using PRM 18 in addition to the impact of analytic variability of PRM or of adaptation of PRM to different automated analyzers in correctly substaging patients according to IRIS guidelines. 19 In the present study, the intra-assay precision of CBB was similar (in sample groups with low UP levels) or better (in medium-and high-level sample pools) than observed with PRM. 18 The inter-assay imprecision on frozen samples cannot be compared with previous studies, but was very low at all protein levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous study, the influence of storage and dilution of urine samples has been investigated using PRM 18 in addition to the impact of analytic variability of PRM or of adaptation of PRM to different automated analyzers in correctly substaging patients according to IRIS guidelines. 19 In the present study, the intra-assay precision of CBB was similar (in sample groups with low UP levels) or better (in medium-and high-level sample pools) than observed with PRM. 18 The inter-assay imprecision on frozen samples cannot be compared with previous studies, but was very low at all protein levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The UC was measured with a modified Jaffe method (Real Time Diagnostic Systems, Viterbo, Italy). This method is linear up to 30 mg/dL; consequently, all samples were manually diluted 1:20 with distilled water to fit the linearity of the method . Occasionally, highly concentrated urine samples were further diluted to 1:100 to fit in the linear measuring range of the method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 This includes minimizing the analytical variability such as using the same instrument and laboratory for repeated measurements as well as limiting preanalytical contributions such as time between specimen collection and analysis, the potential influence of sample collection timing, and variation between single and pooled specimens. [23][24][25] Twenty-four-hour urine collection for protein quantification is considered the gold standard method for assessing proteinuria. 20 Although the UPC does correlate with 24-hour urine protein excretion, variability can occur in spot UPC results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64,87 In the interpretation of borderline results, particular attention should be paid to potential analytic factors that can influence the UPC ratio such as type of reagent, methods, or instruments. [88][89][90] Quantification of proteinuria must be repeatedly assessed (3 times in 2 weeks 84 or once on pooled urine 91 ) because additional investigations or treatments should only be pursued if proteinuria is persistent. [84][85][86][87] Finally, the origin of urinary protein should be assessed by a histologic examination of a renal biopsy.…”
Section: Abnormalities Of Urinalysismentioning
confidence: 99%