2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.03.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of internal inhomogeneity on the activity of comet nuclei – Application to Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "outbursty" activity of Echeclus could be interpreted as being due to internal heterogeneities, possibly reflecting its rubble-pile nature (either primordial or collisional, see Rousselot et al 2016). In fact, Rosenberg & Prialnik (2010) showed that internal heterogeneities could potentially be detected through the activity pattern of a comet, where erratic behaviors would be induced by blocks of varying thermo-physical properties randomly distributed inside the nucleus.…”
Section: Interiorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "outbursty" activity of Echeclus could be interpreted as being due to internal heterogeneities, possibly reflecting its rubble-pile nature (either primordial or collisional, see Rousselot et al 2016). In fact, Rosenberg & Prialnik (2010) showed that internal heterogeneities could potentially be detected through the activity pattern of a comet, where erratic behaviors would be induced by blocks of varying thermo-physical properties randomly distributed inside the nucleus.…”
Section: Interiorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter scenario was favored by Belton (2008) to explain mini-outbursts observed in 9P/Tempel-1 but since we found a non-explosive outburst the former mechanism might apply in our case. Recent work on thermal comet evolution models using lower thermal conductivity values as usually employed in the past find that the crystallization front may be located at rather shallow depths of the order of 0.5 to several meters (Marboeuf & Schmitt 2014) and also might be locally inhomogeneous dependent on the initial composition and structure of the nucleus (Rosenberg & Prialnik 2010). These findings make this explanation more attractive in our case because it is difficult to imagine that such a small event has its origin deep inside the nucleus as would be required by older calculations of the depth of the crystallization front.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible mechanism found by Rosenberg & Prialnik (2010) is that erratic activity and outbursts which occur more or less randomly distributed over the orbit and local time may be the consequence of internal inhomogeneity of the nucleus structure and composition. Although the diverse interactions of their different inhomogeneities are very complex it seems that a low conductivity layer blocking further penetration of the heat wave beneath an ice rich upper layer could promote small outbursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important feature of this model is including the sintering of ice grains, and the temperature dependent sublimation coefficient of ice. These effects are included neither in the ATPM model described in Rozitis and Green (2011), nor in the model Rosenberg and Prialnik (2010) which includes calculation of the heat transport within comet nucleus in 3D.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%