2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-008-0770-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of intraarticular combinations of tramadol and ropivacaine with ketamine on postoperative pain after arthroscopic meniscectomy

Abstract: Administration of intraarticular tramadol-ketamine combination was found to be more effective in decreasing postoperative daily analgesic consumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our sample size estimation was based upon the assumption, derived from results from previous studies, that patients in the placebo group would have a VAS score regarding our primary outcome of approximately 40 (SD 25) mm. [14][15][16][17][18] The observed VAS scores in our trial were, however, considerably lower, the median pain scores for patients at standing, 2 h after ACB, being 15 vs. 17 mm in the ropivacaine and the control group, respectively. Therefore, the fact that we could not detect a potential difference between the VAS scores in the randomised groups may be due to insufficient assay sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our sample size estimation was based upon the assumption, derived from results from previous studies, that patients in the placebo group would have a VAS score regarding our primary outcome of approximately 40 (SD 25) mm. [14][15][16][17][18] The observed VAS scores in our trial were, however, considerably lower, the median pain scores for patients at standing, 2 h after ACB, being 15 vs. 17 mm in the ropivacaine and the control group, respectively. Therefore, the fact that we could not detect a potential difference between the VAS scores in the randomised groups may be due to insufficient assay sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…There were no statistically significant differences between groups for AUC (weighted average level) regarding pain at rest (0-24 h): 10 (1-23) vs. 13 (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) Regarding levels of dizziness, sedation and nausea, number of vomits, number of patients vomiting and consumption of ondansetron, there were no significant differences at any time points between groups.…”
Section: Secondary Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Entretanto, neste estudo não se utilizou métodos para se determinar o grau de analgesia do protocolo, pois o reflexo ao pinçamento discutido anteriormente reflete a sedação e os reflexos motores e não a qualidade analgésica (Monteiro et al 2009). Embora encontre se estudos em humanos (Ayoglu et al 2010) e suínos (Ajadi et al 2009) que comprovem a associação benéfica da cetamina com o tramadol para aumentar o grau de analgesia dos pacientes, ainda são necessários mais estudos com relação à utilização e dosagem do tramadol em espécies selvagens. Em relação ao tempo total de sedação (38±7min no TZ e 48±4min no CEMTRA) e tempo de recuperação total (150±42min no CEMTRA e de 73±20min no TZ), observou se maiores valores no grupo CEMTRA, diferindo estatisticamente do grupo TZ.…”
Section: Quadro 1 Valores Médios E Desvios-padrão De Frequência Cardunclassified
“…Los receptores tipo NMDA se hallan ampliamente repartidos por el sistema nervioso y la administración a nivel periférico de diversos fár-macos antagonistas de los receptores NMDA poseen diversas acciones antiinflamatorias y antinociceptivas 8,9 . Las vías de administración del clorhidrato de ketamina, antagonista de los receptores NMDA, son múltiples [10][11][12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified