1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(87)80572-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of intraosseous sodium bicarbonate on bone in swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This same trend was observed by Spivey and colleagues who compared IO and IV administration of diazepam in swine. Diazepam plasma levels were higher after IV for the first 5 minutes following administration but were less than IO for the remainder of the 20-minute experiment 16, 17. This trend has not been observed in all studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This same trend was observed by Spivey and colleagues who compared IO and IV administration of diazepam in swine. Diazepam plasma levels were higher after IV for the first 5 minutes following administration but were less than IO for the remainder of the 20-minute experiment 16, 17. This trend has not been observed in all studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Intraosseous needles were placed in young growing pigs, and pigs were observed for 1, 3, or 6 months; no clinical abnormalities were reported. 9,[37][38][39] The only clinical abnormality detected in our study was a firm, raised nodule at the site of IO needle puncture in 2 pigs. A similar finding was reported in children 30 to 40 days following IO infusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…40 Others have also reported similar lesions in pigs that received sodium bicarbonate intraosseously; these lesions resolved within 60 days. 39 In several previous studies in which IO needles were used for sample collection, histologic evaluation of bones was not reported. [28][29][30][31][32][33] However, results of other studies in which IO infusions were administered to humans and other animals revealed no histologic abnormalities, 18 decreased marrow cellularity, 10,37,j mild focal fibrosis, 9 or marrow degeneration and fat necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, experimental [15][16][17][18] studies which examined macroscopic and histologic bony damage some weeks after intraosseous infusion and second clinical studies 1-4 which followed radiologically tibial length within a follow-up time younger than or equal to 2 years. In this first group, the only macroscopic and histologic findings were minimal damage to the cells surrounding the injection site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells and supporting bony matrix elsewhere appeared normal. 2,[15][16][17][18] Even in the Brickman et al study, 18 which involved direct damage to the growth plate in a pig model, there was no radiographic evidence of growth abnormalities 6 months later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%