2010
DOI: 10.1080/10580530903455106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of IT Governance Maturity on IT Governance Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected system would not only enhance the integration level as required for effective governance, but would also boost internal efficiency in operating and managing staff and students, and serve to improve HCMCOU's competiveness over other universities. These objectives were consistent with what should be expected from a high-performing IT organization, according to Simonsson, Johnson, and Ekstedt (2010).…”
Section: The Expectations For the New Lmssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The expected system would not only enhance the integration level as required for effective governance, but would also boost internal efficiency in operating and managing staff and students, and serve to improve HCMCOU's competiveness over other universities. These objectives were consistent with what should be expected from a high-performing IT organization, according to Simonsson, Johnson, and Ekstedt (2010).…”
Section: The Expectations For the New Lmssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Henderson and Lentz (1996), Luftman and Brier (1999), and Weill and Broadbent (1998) further add that IT process involves the formation of cases of IT business, priority, justification, permission from the IT investment, the implementation of IT monitoring and evaluation, as well as IT performance. Consequently, ITGI (2007) and Simonsson, Johnson, and Ekstedt (2010) address that all IT process needs to be evaluated periodically to ensure the quality and suitable with the control mechanism. In fact, Hewitt and Michael (1986) recommend that monitoring is made an internal activity to determine the feedback on each progress including all advantages and drawbacks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the organizational quality and practices of IT governance varies among firms, depending on aspects such as whether rights and responsibilities are well distributed among appropriate people, whether formalized processes for important tasks are in place or whether there is adequate documentation (Simonsson, Johnson, & Ekstedt, 2010).…”
Section: Strategic Alignment and It Governancementioning
confidence: 99%