2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00079-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of khat chewing on gallbladder motility in a group of volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects on the gal bladder Khat chewing has no clinically significant effect on gal bladder motility [62].…”
Section: Subjective Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Effects on the gal bladder Khat chewing has no clinically significant effect on gal bladder motility [62].…”
Section: Subjective Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An increase in the prevalence of gallstones has been reported in the Middle East and Yemen but whether this is due to khat consumption is not known. However, gallbladder motility was found to be unaffected by acute khat chewing in healthy volunteers (Murugan et al, 2003). Khat leaves are traditionally considered to be a herbal remedy to alleviate respiratory disease symptoms and therefore may have effects on the airways (Al-Meshal et al, 1985).…”
Section: Khat Chewing and Other Peripheral Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, various controversial reports have been made on khat concerning health (Ihunwo et al, 2004;Toennes, Harder, Schramm Niess & kauert, 2003;Murugan, Burkhill, Williams, Padley & Murray-Lyon, 2003;Nencini & Ahmed, 1989); psychosocial implications (Hassan, Gunaid , El Khally & Murray-Lyon, 2002;Alem & Shibre, 1997;Stefan & Mathew, 2005); economic effects (Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, 2005;Feyisa & Aune, 2003;Balint & Balint, 1994;Kalix, 1994), academic achievement (Ihunwo et al, 2004;Widler, Mathys, Brenneisen, Kalix & Fisch, 1994), moral implications and the legality of khat (Elmi, 1983;Goudie, 1987). More so, there have been many controversial statements concerning the use of this substance (Abbink, 1992;Weir, 1985;Varisco, 1986; Ministry of Information and National Guidance, 1983;Cassanelli, 1986;Abbink, 1992;National Drug Intelligence Center, 2007;Kalix, Geisshuster & Brenneisen, 1987;Smith, 1994;Beekhuis, 1996;Nencini, Ahmed & Aminconi, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%