1994
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(94)90094-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of late pregnancy on the diet selections made by ewes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of a series of subsequent experiments were consistent with the idea that cows, given a choice between foods with different RDP contents, selected sufficient RDP and also avoided eating an excess (Tolkamp et al 1998b). These findings need to be reconciled with the results of other research in which ruminants seemed to be able to select a diet that reflected their protein needs according to their physiological state (Kyriazakis & Oldham, 1993;Cooper et al 1994;Kyriazakis et al 1994). In the latter experiments there were differences between the diets used in both their calculated MP yields and in their RDP contents, and it is not clear whether the diet selection observed in these experiments should be interpreted in terms of the MP or the RDP axis.…”
Section: The Role Of Internal State In Diet Selectionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The results of a series of subsequent experiments were consistent with the idea that cows, given a choice between foods with different RDP contents, selected sufficient RDP and also avoided eating an excess (Tolkamp et al 1998b). These findings need to be reconciled with the results of other research in which ruminants seemed to be able to select a diet that reflected their protein needs according to their physiological state (Kyriazakis & Oldham, 1993;Cooper et al 1994;Kyriazakis et al 1994). In the latter experiments there were differences between the diets used in both their calculated MP yields and in their RDP contents, and it is not clear whether the diet selection observed in these experiments should be interpreted in terms of the MP or the RDP axis.…”
Section: The Role Of Internal State In Diet Selectionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In accordance with this proposal, food intake is frequently observed to decline over a number of days prior to parturition in several species including mice (e.g. Cooper et al, 1994;French, 2006;Gordon and Tribe, 1951;Johnson et al, 2001a). This tradeoff may potentially impose a limit on total reproductive investment, and more generally competition by different organs for abdominal space has been envisaged as a constraining factor in evolution, particularly in herbivores (Clauss et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…They seem able to discriminate the effects of energy and protein (Wang and Provenza, 1996a), and faced with a choice between foods varying in both, sheep select diets with relatively constant protein/energy ratios (Kyriazakis and Oldham, 1993;Provenza et al, 1996). Previous work has shown that sheep balance their intake of ruminally degradable proteins and soluble carbohydrates (Kyriazakis and Oldham, 1997), according to their requirements (Cooper et al, 1994). Furthermore, their voluntary intake of roughages also appears to be related to the protein/energy ratios of digestion products that arise from roughage consumption (Egan, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current work, we investigated a more complex feeding situation by applying the conditioning method in a choice situation involving three foods, each associated with both energy-based and protein-based postingestive consequences of varying intensity. Furthermore, since modification of nutritional state leads to a change in nutrient requirements and diet selection (Cooper et al, 1994;Kyriazakis et al, 1994;Wang and Provenza, 1996b;Villalba and Provenza, 1999b), we tested preferences of animals fed a basal diet allowing different growth rates on an energy and protein basis in order to see whether the low nutritional level would make them more sensitive to nutrient rewards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%