1952
DOI: 10.1080/00049158.1952.10675285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Leaf Litter on Surface Soil Properties of the Jarrah Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil C:N ratio in all of the burn treatments was less than 20:1, which is comparable to levels recorded for unmined forest in the current study but considerably lower than the ratios of 35-45:1 previously recorded in the jarrah forest (Wallace and Hatch, 1952;Todd et al, 2000). The high proportion of litterfall from leguminous species in rehabilitated areas that have a high concentration of N and other nutrients predispose them to rapid decomposition (Hingston, 1980).…”
Section: Pre-1988 Rehabilitationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The soil C:N ratio in all of the burn treatments was less than 20:1, which is comparable to levels recorded for unmined forest in the current study but considerably lower than the ratios of 35-45:1 previously recorded in the jarrah forest (Wallace and Hatch, 1952;Todd et al, 2000). The high proportion of litterfall from leguminous species in rehabilitated areas that have a high concentration of N and other nutrients predispose them to rapid decomposition (Hingston, 1980).…”
Section: Pre-1988 Rehabilitationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Pomaderris has a nutrient content not unlike that of some American species of Fraxinus and Quercus. The total weight of nutrients returned by E. regnans forests is similar to an average for several American conifers (Lutz and Chandler (Webb et al 1969), but is two to six times as great as that of dry sclerophyll forests of E. marginata in Western Australia (Wallace and Hatch 1955), and 1 .3-2 3 times that of the dry sclerophyll forests of E. obliqua in Victoria (Attiwill 19663). The weights of nutrients returned in the annual litter fall are given in Table 7.…”
Section: Nutrient Returnmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The ratio for E. marginata in dry sclerophyll forest soils in Western Australia is, however, three times this (Wallace andHatch 1952, 1955).…”
Section: Carbon/nitrogen Ratiomentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the classification of Specht (1970) these are referred to as open forest and tall open forest, respectively. The amounts of litter fall (Wallace & Hatch 1952;Hatch 1955;O'Connell et al 1979a) and nutrient content of litter on the forest floor (O'Connell et al 1978) have been reported for jarrah forest. In karri forest estimates have been made of weights of litter falling annually in mature and pole stands (Stoate 1958), the rates of litter accumulation (Peet 1971) and the nutrient content of litter on the forest floor (Hingston et al 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%