1995
DOI: 10.2307/2329425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Lender Identity on a Borrowing Firm's Equity Return

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
173
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
20
173
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We address 49 We acknowledge that there are at least two alternative channels as to how the secondary loan market in uences loan spreads in addition to the diversi cation e ect described above. First, there is substantial evidence that banks get access to private information when they extend loans to rms (James (1987), Lummer and McConnell (1989), Best and Zhang (1993), and Billett, Flannery, and Gar nkel (1995)). Secondary loan prices reveal information about the rm to investors and may lead to a reduction in the cost of debt (information e ect), for example, by reducing the information premium demanded by banks or by reducing the informational advantage of relationship banks (Rajan (1992)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We address 49 We acknowledge that there are at least two alternative channels as to how the secondary loan market in uences loan spreads in addition to the diversi cation e ect described above. First, there is substantial evidence that banks get access to private information when they extend loans to rms (James (1987), Lummer and McConnell (1989), Best and Zhang (1993), and Billett, Flannery, and Gar nkel (1995)). Secondary loan prices reveal information about the rm to investors and may lead to a reduction in the cost of debt (information e ect), for example, by reducing the information premium demanded by banks or by reducing the informational advantage of relationship banks (Rajan (1992)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 James (1987) finds a significant positive impact of announcement of bank loan agreements; Lummer and McConnell (1989) document a positive impact of favorable loan renewals while non-renewals are accompanied by negative returns for the borrowers. Billet, Flannery, and Garfinkel (1995) show that the impact of loan announcements is positively related to the quality of the lender. Best and Zhang (1993) document evidence that the stock market reaction is strongest for those borrowers where the quality of Smith (2000) provide a comprehensive review of the past and recent research on the special nature of bank loan financing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Chemmanur and Fulghieri (1994) discovered that firms are happy to pay a higher interest rate on loans from reputable banks in exchange for financial flexibility in the case of financial distress. Billett et al (1995) pointed out that lender reputation is an important factor which could influence the market response to loan announcement. Billett et al (1995) argued since private and public securities are not perfect substitute for firms, lender identity must affect the abnormal returns from firms.…”
Section: Lender Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Billett et al (1995) pointed out that lender reputation is an important factor which could influence the market response to loan announcement. Billett et al (1995) argued since private and public securities are not perfect substitute for firms, lender identity must affect the abnormal returns from firms. The authors stated that the borrower could enjoy a higher quality evaluating service and more accurate monitoring from high credit rating lenders.…”
Section: Lender Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation