2002
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/15.3.723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Leverage on Bidding Behavior: Theory and Evidence from the FCC Auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He also finds that this is the second best proxy (after stock returns) for explaining debt ratio changes for Compustat firms. Clayton and Ravid (2002) find empirical support for the prediction that firms with higher leverage are likely to lose bidding contests.…”
Section: Empirical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He also finds that this is the second best proxy (after stock returns) for explaining debt ratio changes for Compustat firms. Clayton and Ravid (2002) find empirical support for the prediction that firms with higher leverage are likely to lose bidding contests.…”
Section: Empirical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Welch (2004) reports that ''firms that have engaged in takeover activity tend to increase leverage.' ' Clayton and Ravid (2002) find empirical support for the prediction that firms with higher leverage are likely to lose bidding contests. 2 Our results are also consistent with the evidence on leverage, product market competition, and investment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Strategic interactions among firms have been found to be important in explaining firms' capital structure choices (e.g., Clayton and Ravid, 2002), strategic investment decisions (Sundaram et al, 1996;Chen et al, 2002), share repurchase decisions (Massa et al, 2007), executive compensation schemes (Aggarwal and Samwick, 1999;Kedia, 2006;Cuñat and Guadalupe, 2009), and analyst earnings forecast accuracy (Datta et al, 2011). These studies do not explore the role of strategic competition in the nature of earnings information conveyed by corporate actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See alsoBolton and Scharfstein (1990),Dotan and Ravid (1985),Hart (1983),Maksimovic (1988),Ravid (1988),and Scharfstein (1988).2 The exceptions areClayton and Ravid (2002),Chevalier (1995),Kovenock and Philips (1997),Phillips (1995),Ryan and Wiggins (2002) andSundaram et al (1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%