2016
DOI: 10.15171/jlms.2016.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on Direct Pulp Capping in Dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An investigation comparing the combination of low‐power laser irradiation and direct pulp capping with ProRoot MTA to the traditional treatments of placing the capping material on the exposure site reported that laser irradiation did not improve pulp responses to ProRoot MTA in terms of hard tissue formation (continuity, morphology and thickness) and inflammatory reactions (type, intensity and extension), and histopathologic change in pulp tissue (necrosis, odontoblastic layer formation and calcification); however, the authors did not compare their results statistically (Bidar et al . ).…”
Section: Vital Pulp Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An investigation comparing the combination of low‐power laser irradiation and direct pulp capping with ProRoot MTA to the traditional treatments of placing the capping material on the exposure site reported that laser irradiation did not improve pulp responses to ProRoot MTA in terms of hard tissue formation (continuity, morphology and thickness) and inflammatory reactions (type, intensity and extension), and histopathologic change in pulp tissue (necrosis, odontoblastic layer formation and calcification); however, the authors did not compare their results statistically (Bidar et al . ).…”
Section: Vital Pulp Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Others revealed that the application of LLLT enhanced bone healing and mineralization in the sockets of rats exposed to diode laser radiation. [19][20][21][22][23] However, some studies found no additional benefits of using low-level lasers over the placebo in several conditions such as releasing pain after the extraction of primary 24 and permanent 25 teeth, reducing pain and swelling following third molar surgery, [26][27][28] improving pulp tissue healing after direct pulp capping in dogs, 29 and attenuating chronic orofacial pain in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD). 30 This randomized, double-blind controlled trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy of LLLT in relieving pain and accelerating the healing of the tooth socket after the extraction of lower molar teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonirradiated control teeth showed intense inflammatory process, and in some cases, evolved to necrosis. 12,13 Infrared usually use tungsten material to the lamp with luminous light. The distance between patients and device are 45 to 60 cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonirradiated control teeth showed intense inflammatory process, and in some cases, evolved to necrosis. 12 13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%