2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of LPA Thr3888Pro on lipoprotein(a) and coronary artery disease is modified by the LPA KIV-2 variant 4925G>A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the regression models including 4925G>A, inclusion of rs41272110 into the regression models did not abolish the association of PNR10 and PNR11 alleles with low Lp(a) (isoform-adjusted model: PNR10: β = −8.74, P = 3.89e-16; PNR11: β = −11.52, P = 5.71e-13; supplemental Table S2 ). Conversely, adding subsequently also KIV-2 4925G>A to the regression model with rs41272110 showed a significant Lp(a)-decreasing effect of 4925G>A (β = −25.42, P = 3.05E-40), a significant Lp(a) increase in carriers of rs41272110 (β = +4.49, P = 0.0018), which is in line with what we have shown previously ( 35 ), and confirm no effect of the PNR alleles PNR10 or PNR11 (PNR10: β = +0.24, P = 0.82; PNR11: β = −1.84, P = 0.25; Table 4 ). This further supports that the effect of the PNR alleles PNR10 and PNR11 allele on Lp(a) is, indeed, caused by KIV-2 4925G>A and not by rs41272110.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the regression models including 4925G>A, inclusion of rs41272110 into the regression models did not abolish the association of PNR10 and PNR11 alleles with low Lp(a) (isoform-adjusted model: PNR10: β = −8.74, P = 3.89e-16; PNR11: β = −11.52, P = 5.71e-13; supplemental Table S2 ). Conversely, adding subsequently also KIV-2 4925G>A to the regression model with rs41272110 showed a significant Lp(a)-decreasing effect of 4925G>A (β = −25.42, P = 3.05E-40), a significant Lp(a) increase in carriers of rs41272110 (β = +4.49, P = 0.0018), which is in line with what we have shown previously ( 35 ), and confirm no effect of the PNR alleles PNR10 or PNR11 (PNR10: β = +0.24, P = 0.82; PNR11: β = −1.84, P = 0.25; Table 4 ). This further supports that the effect of the PNR alleles PNR10 and PNR11 allele on Lp(a) is, indeed, caused by KIV-2 4925G>A and not by rs41272110.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies suggested an LD between alleles PNR10 and PNR11 and rs41272110 ( 24 , 26 ). We have shown recently that the individual effect of rs41272110 on Lp(a) depends on the KIV-2 4925G>A carrier status and that the Lp(a) decrease previously attributed to rs41272110 is produced by a partial LD with 4925G>A ( 35 ). Given the occurrence of the alleles PNR10 and PNR11 in the same isoform range as 4925G>A and rs41272110, we hypothesized that a similar mechanism might also cause the association of PNR10 and PNR11 with low Lp(a) plasma concentrations ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations