“…In contrast to the regression models including 4925G>A, inclusion of rs41272110 into the regression models did not abolish the association of PNR10 and PNR11 alleles with low Lp(a) (isoform-adjusted model: PNR10: β = −8.74, P = 3.89e-16; PNR11: β = −11.52, P = 5.71e-13; supplemental Table S2 ). Conversely, adding subsequently also KIV-2 4925G>A to the regression model with rs41272110 showed a significant Lp(a)-decreasing effect of 4925G>A (β = −25.42, P = 3.05E-40), a significant Lp(a) increase in carriers of rs41272110 (β = +4.49, P = 0.0018), which is in line with what we have shown previously ( 35 ), and confirm no effect of the PNR alleles PNR10 or PNR11 (PNR10: β = +0.24, P = 0.82; PNR11: β = −1.84, P = 0.25; Table 4 ). This further supports that the effect of the PNR alleles PNR10 and PNR11 allele on Lp(a) is, indeed, caused by KIV-2 4925G>A and not by rs41272110.…”