2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of luteal phase vaginal estradiol supplementation on the success of in vitro fertilization treatment: a prospective randomized study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
52
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, treatment outcomes-except embryo gradwere not significantly different between two groups. In the same protocol to our study, Engmann et al revealed that addition of vaginal E2 supplementation (4 mg/d) to the routine P supplementation as luteal support does not improve pregnancy rates in IVF treatment [11]. In a systematic review article in 2008, Gelbaya et al reached no beneficial effects for IVF/ICSI patients who received E2 besides P [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, treatment outcomes-except embryo gradwere not significantly different between two groups. In the same protocol to our study, Engmann et al revealed that addition of vaginal E2 supplementation (4 mg/d) to the routine P supplementation as luteal support does not improve pregnancy rates in IVF treatment [11]. In a systematic review article in 2008, Gelbaya et al reached no beneficial effects for IVF/ICSI patients who received E2 besides P [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Several treatment protocols have been presented for improvement of ART outcomes in poor responders, but they are still in accompanying with high treatment failure rates [9][10][11]. The role of progesterone (P) supplementation in the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is well established worldwide [12], but the influence of the luteal phase E2 level on implantation is not clearly defined [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Kolibianakis et al (8) performed a metaanalysis and systematic review that included four truly randomized studies (9)(10)(11)(12), and they concluded that the addition of estrogen to P for luteal phase support does not increase the probability of pregnancy in IVF. However, variations exist between the eligible studies regarding the type and dose of estrogen administered as well as their route of administration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…опубликовали метаанализ в базе данных Cochrane, в который вклю-чили 9 исследований и 1571 цикл ЭКО [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Ав-торы оценивали влияние приема эстрадиола в люте-иновую фазу стимулированного цикла на вероят-ность наступления беременности, частоту СГЯ, вы-кидышей и родов в зависимости от способа введения препарата (пероральный, трансдермальный или ва-гинальный) и протокола стимуляции (с агонистами или антагонистами ГнРГ).…”
Section: влияние уровня эстрадиола на исход экоunclassified