2010
DOI: 10.3109/13685530903536643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of male body mass index on sperm parameters

Abstract: Overweight and obese men have been reported to have lower sperm quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate, whether body mass index (BMI) is related to changes in semen parameters. In a cross-sectional study, sperm parameters were reviewed in 852 normal, healthy men, of reproductive age (25-50). BMI was divided into four groups: underweight, normal, overweight and obese. Sperm concentration of overweight and obese men were 63 and 62, respectively, which were lower than subjects with normal BMI (71). Total … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Jensen et al [2004a] noticed a reduction in sperm concentration and total sperm count among overweight, obese, and underweight men. Men presenting with a BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 have fewer chromatin-intact normal-motile sperm cells per ejaculate [Kort et al 2006] and a lower total sperm count and sperm motility [Sekhavat and Moein 2010]. Whereas metaanalysis of 31 studies found no evidence of an association between increased BMI and semen parameters [MacDonald et al 2010].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jensen et al [2004a] noticed a reduction in sperm concentration and total sperm count among overweight, obese, and underweight men. Men presenting with a BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 have fewer chromatin-intact normal-motile sperm cells per ejaculate [Kort et al 2006] and a lower total sperm count and sperm motility [Sekhavat and Moein 2010]. Whereas metaanalysis of 31 studies found no evidence of an association between increased BMI and semen parameters [MacDonald et al 2010].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, but five did not pass critical appraisal due to shortcomings in their statistical analysis or reporting (Al-Ali et al, 2012Jamshidi, 2011;Relwani et al, 2011;Sekhavat and Moein, 2010) (Figure 1 Supplementary Table S1). The overall quality of included studies ranged from 4/9 to 8/9.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GnRH data also suggest that E 2 feedback at the pituitary level was not greatly altered by flutamide, inasmuch as E 2 feedback would be expected to blunt GnRH action ‘Urban et al (1988b)’. Moreover, E 2 feedback itself does not seem to change with age ‘Ten Kulve et al (2010)’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%