2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of male dominance on female choice in a field cricket (Gryllus assimilis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this hypothesis, our results revealed that the amount of time focal females spent associating with the larger of the two stimulus males in the dichotomous mate choice test was influenced by female body size, but only when the size difference between the potential mates was large. This finding concurs with the switch point theorem and other studies that have also reported a mating preference for larger males by female Gryllus assimilis (Bertram et al, ; Loranger & Bertram, ). Likewise, a study investigating female preference for sound pressure level in Jamaican field crickets found that females prefer louder male calls (Pacheco & Bertram, ), a relevant finding given that larger males signal louder than smaller males (Pacheco, Dawson, Jutting, & Bertram, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In support of this hypothesis, our results revealed that the amount of time focal females spent associating with the larger of the two stimulus males in the dichotomous mate choice test was influenced by female body size, but only when the size difference between the potential mates was large. This finding concurs with the switch point theorem and other studies that have also reported a mating preference for larger males by female Gryllus assimilis (Bertram et al, ; Loranger & Bertram, ). Likewise, a study investigating female preference for sound pressure level in Jamaican field crickets found that females prefer louder male calls (Pacheco & Bertram, ), a relevant finding given that larger males signal louder than smaller males (Pacheco, Dawson, Jutting, & Bertram, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, male fitness appears to be dependent on the ability to both grow larger during development and have enough energy to signal often during adulthood. These results add to a growing literature suggesting that overall male condition influences female mate choice (Bertram, Loranger, & Thomson, ; Bertram et al, ; Loranger & Bertram, ); that is, female mate choice is conditional. Further, these data also suggest that understanding female mate choice is not simple.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, egg oviposition may be entirely in the female's control and females may be selected to oviposit more eggs when mating with larger males. Provided body size is heritable (Simons & Roff, 1994), T A B L E 2 Results of a two-part logit-linear model examining factors influencing egg viability: the probability of producing at least some eggs that successfully hatch (nominal logistic regression χ 2 = 8.79; df = 5,59; R 2 adj = .16; p = .118) and, for mated pairs with egg hatching success, the proportion of eggs that hatched (GLM: F = 0.91; df = 5,44; R 2 adj = .09; p = .481) larger sons should experience higher reproductive success than smaller sons because they are more likely to win aggressive contests with rivals, achieving a high dominance status and access to mating territories; larger sons should also have more mating opportunities because females prefer to mate with dominant over subordinate males (Loranger & Bertram, 2016a). Similarly, larger sons should experience higher reproductive success than smaller sons because larger males signal for mates louder and more often, and females find louder mate signals more attractive (Bertram, Fitzsimmons, McAuley, Rundle, & Gorelick, 2012;Bertram & Rook, 2012;Pacheco & Bertram, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%