2008
DOI: 10.1080/09652540802480944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Management Commitment to Service Quality on Frontline Employees' Job Attitudes, Turnover Intentions and Service Recovery Performance in a New Public Management Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
103
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
9
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Management commitment to service quality refers to "employees' appraisal of an organization's commitment to nurture, develop, support, and reward its employees to achieve service excellence" (Babakus et al 2003: 275). A close examination of the services marketing literature delineates a number of potential indicators of management commitment to service quality (for example, training, empowerment, rewards, service technology, perceived organizational support, recruitment and selection, and servant leadership) (Ashill et al 2008;Babakus et al 2003;Kim et al 2009;Schneider et al 1998). Consistent with the work of Babakus et al (2003) and Pfeffer's (1994) list of best human resource practices, training, empowerment, and rewards are considered to be the significant indicators of management commitment to service quality in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management commitment to service quality refers to "employees' appraisal of an organization's commitment to nurture, develop, support, and reward its employees to achieve service excellence" (Babakus et al 2003: 275). A close examination of the services marketing literature delineates a number of potential indicators of management commitment to service quality (for example, training, empowerment, rewards, service technology, perceived organizational support, recruitment and selection, and servant leadership) (Ashill et al 2008;Babakus et al 2003;Kim et al 2009;Schneider et al 1998). Consistent with the work of Babakus et al (2003) and Pfeffer's (1994) list of best human resource practices, training, empowerment, and rewards are considered to be the significant indicators of management commitment to service quality in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ashill et al [14] regarded manager committed quality of service, covering training, empowerment, employee rewards, supportive management, servant leadership, and service techniques, as the factor in the emotion of an organization to affect the frontline employees' job satisfaction and further influence the service recovery performance. Kim and Oh [15] considered service recovery efforts, including customer-oriented service, employee rewards, customer complaint management, customer service training, empowerment, and teamwork, as the antecedents of Service Recovery Performance.…”
Section: Employee Efforts and Service Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An employee could effectively do the job when an organization could help to deal with stress. A frontline employee would present active behaviors and reactions and work hard to reward the support [14] as well as enhance the job satisfaction and job engagement [5]. Based on above statements, supportive service would influence a frontline employee's Service Recovery Performance that.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations