1981
DOI: 10.2307/351337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Marital Status on Person Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, both sexes rated married individuals more favorably than all groups of unmarried individuals (Etaugh & Malstrom, 1981), and both sexes rated single targets as having more risky personality traits and as being less responsible (Conley & Collins, 2002).…”
Section: Potential Moderating Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, both sexes rated married individuals more favorably than all groups of unmarried individuals (Etaugh & Malstrom, 1981), and both sexes rated single targets as having more risky personality traits and as being less responsible (Conley & Collins, 2002).…”
Section: Potential Moderating Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because women, but not men, are viewed more negatively if they are delayed in marrying (Krueger, Heckhausen, & Hundertmark, 1995), one might expect women more than men to be the target of the negative single stereotype. However, empirical evidence revealed that perceptions of single women were not more negative than perceptions of single men (e.g., Conley & Collins, 2002;Etaugh & Malstrom, 1981;Morris et al, 2004).…”
Section: Potential Moderating Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Records of these stereotypes have accompanied single people from past decades (Etaugh & Malstrom, 1981) up to the present day (Greitemeyer, 2009;Morris, Sinclair, & DePaulo, 2007). Etaugh and Malstrom (1981) demonstrated that differences exist between married people and those who are single with regard to perception. They found that the former are perceived positively as opposed to singles who, according to Conley and Collins (2002), are considered to be less responsible and more promiscuous.…”
Section: Miedo a Estar Sola: Evidencias Psicométricas Y De Validez Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Registros sobre estes estereótipos acompanham os solteiros desde dé-cadas passadas (Etaugh & Malstrom, 1981) até os dias atuais (Greitemeyer, 2009;Morris, Sinclair, & DePaulo, 2007 Como exposto, a forte pressão exercida pela sociedade, fruto dos estereótipos produzidos, resulta em uma contínua busca pelo estabelecimento de contatos sociais, podendo tornar-se um obstáculo para o crescimento pessoal (Osin & Leontiev, 2013 (2002) verifi caram que o nível de autoestima dos estudantes era diretamente proporcional ao padrão desejado no parceiro, ou seja, um indivíduo com uma autoestima baixa provavelmente apresentaria padrões mais baixos que àqueles com autoestima mais alta. Spielmann et al (2013) enfocam que as pesquisas sobre relacionamentos foram conduzidas focando em experiências sobre estar solteiro, o que, para os autores, são limitadas, especialmente no que se refere ao enfoque do estudo.…”
Section: Miedo a Estar Sola: Evidencias Psicométricas Y De Validez Deunclassified