2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of mate value feedback on women's mating aspirations and mate preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have found that mate value has a significant predictive effect with respect to the mate selection strategy (Surbey and Brice, 2007;Zhang et al, 2016). The amount of financial resources that a man possesses is a positive predictor of his mate value (Shackelford et al, 2005), and individual self-perceived mate value has a significant impact on cue preferences in mate selection (Surbey and Brice, 2007;Back et al, 2011;Reeve et al, 2016). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that mate value plays a mediating role in the influence of financial resources on cue preferences in mate selection.…”
Section: Mediating Effect Of Mate Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have found that mate value has a significant predictive effect with respect to the mate selection strategy (Surbey and Brice, 2007;Zhang et al, 2016). The amount of financial resources that a man possesses is a positive predictor of his mate value (Shackelford et al, 2005), and individual self-perceived mate value has a significant impact on cue preferences in mate selection (Surbey and Brice, 2007;Back et al, 2011;Reeve et al, 2016). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that mate value plays a mediating role in the influence of financial resources on cue preferences in mate selection.…”
Section: Mediating Effect Of Mate Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Simpson and colleagues (2001) argued that rejected individuals should expand their range of acceptable partners (i.e., increase their flexibility), and those who experience success should decrease this range. This theoretical foundation, combined with prior research on the relation between rejection and shifts in ideal standards (e.g., Reeve et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2015) suggests people who experience romantic rejection will likely increase their ideal flexibility, and those who experience romantic acceptance will likely decrease it.…”
Section: Social Acceptance and Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Research guided by the ISM has not yet tested these hypotheses, but some literature supports the idea. Specifically, rejection has been shown to decrease choosiness (Reeve, Kelley, & Welling, 2016), mate expectations (Zhang et al, 2015), and mating aspirations (Kavanagh et al, 2010), while acceptance has been shown to increase mating aspirations (Kavanagh et al, 2010) and self-esteem (Kavanagh, Fletcher, & Ellis, 2014). However, some studies do not find such effects for acceptance (Zhang et al, 2015), which aligns with sociometer theory’s argument that acceptance is less impactful than rejection.…”
Section: Ideal Standards Flexibility and Self-perceived Mate Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests people who experience romantic rejection will likely increase their ideal flexibility, and those who experience romantic acceptance will likely decrease it. The present study is the first to test these ideas longitudinallyprior researchers have instead manipulated rejection by giving participants bogus feedback (Kavanagh et al, 2010(Kavanagh et al, , 2014Pass et al, 2010;Reeve et al, 2016), asking them to recall personal experiences (Ruan & Zhang, 2012), or having participants imagine their responses to scenarios depicted in vignettes (Zhang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Acceptance and Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%