1987
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90141-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of MDMA (“Ecstasy”) and its optical isomers on schedule-controlled responding in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study used racemic compounds since these would be the form in which people both obtain and misuse them. While Schmidt et al (1986) reported that (+)-MDMA and (-)-MDMA were equipotent in releasing 5-HT in vitro, evidence from behavioural studies indicates that in vivo, the (+ )-enantiomer is as much as fourfold more potent (Hiramatsu et al, 1989;Glennon et al, 1987). Similarly, (+ )-MDA is more potent than (-)-MDA in evoking 5-HT-mediated behaviour (Hiramatsu et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study used racemic compounds since these would be the form in which people both obtain and misuse them. While Schmidt et al (1986) reported that (+)-MDMA and (-)-MDMA were equipotent in releasing 5-HT in vitro, evidence from behavioural studies indicates that in vivo, the (+ )-enantiomer is as much as fourfold more potent (Hiramatsu et al, 1989;Glennon et al, 1987). Similarly, (+ )-MDA is more potent than (-)-MDA in evoking 5-HT-mediated behaviour (Hiramatsu et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, R(Ϫ)-MDMA may simply be less potent than S(ϩ)-or racemic MDMA in terms of discriminative stimulus effects. Likewise, the lethal effects of R(Ϫ)-MDMA are less potent than those of S(ϩ)-and racemic MDMA in mice (Fantegrossi et al, 2003), and R(Ϫ)-MDMA is 4-fold less potent than S(ϩ)-and racemic MDMA in suppressing operant responding in the mouse (Glennon et al, 1987). Such potency differences are not universally reported, however, because head twitch behavior elicited by S(ϩ)-and R(Ϫ)-MDMA occurs over a comparable dose range (Fantegrossi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with our results, previous studies have reported detrimental effects of acute MDMA on instrumental responding in different laboratory animals. Thus, rate-decreasing effects of MDMA on FR schedules of food reinforcement have been observed in pigeons (Nader et al 1989), rats (Li et al 1989;Nagilla et al 1998) and mice (Glennon et al 1987;Miczek and Haney 1994). Performance under PR schedules is also disrupted by acute doses of MDMA (1.0 mg/kg) in monkeys (Frederick and Paule 1997) and in rats (3.2 and 5.6 mg/kg; Laraway et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%