2023
DOI: 10.1002/hec.4783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Medicaid expansion on the take‐up of disability benefits by race and ethnicity

Becky Staiger,
Madeline Helfer,
Jessica Van Parys

Abstract: Public disability programs provide financial support to 12 million working‐age individuals per year, though not all eligible individuals take up these programs. Mixed evidence exists regarding the impact of Medicaid eligibility expansion on program take‐up, and even less is known about the relationship between Medicaid expansion and racial and ethnic disparities in take‐up. Using 2009–2020 Current Population Survey data, we compare changes in Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the findings may reflect that Medicaid expansion fostered greater agency in job selection among lower-income workers. [39][40][41] Work from the pre-ACA era shows that few people substitute Medicaid for private health insurance coverage voluntarily. 42 On the other hand, Medicaid may also be associated with administrative burdens and narrower network options for beneficiaries relative to private health insurance coverage, resulting in the introduction of additional barriers to care for a population of workers already at-risk of adverse health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the findings may reflect that Medicaid expansion fostered greater agency in job selection among lower-income workers. [39][40][41] Work from the pre-ACA era shows that few people substitute Medicaid for private health insurance coverage voluntarily. 42 On the other hand, Medicaid may also be associated with administrative burdens and narrower network options for beneficiaries relative to private health insurance coverage, resulting in the introduction of additional barriers to care for a population of workers already at-risk of adverse health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%