2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6612805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Mental Fatigue and Gender on Working Memory Performance during Repeated Practice by Young and Older Adults

Abstract: Working memory (WM) is one of the most investigated cognitive functions albeit the extent to which individual characteristics impact on performance is still unclear, especially when older adults are involved. The present study considers repeated practice of a visual N -Back task with three difficulty levels (1-, 2-, and 3-Back) in healthy young and older individuals. Our results reveal that, for both age groups, the expected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following individual features (and the reason behind their selection) were analysed using a multiple meta-regression: age (chosen based on deterioration of cognitive abilities with old age and the development of the brain during youth [ 53 , 54 ]), biological sex (chosen based on the different ways that men and women cope with mental load [ 36 , 55 ]), anthropometric measures (based on a link between body mass index (BMI)/body fat percentage, a typical measure of health, and cognitive abilities [ 56 ]) and training level (based on the hypothesized cognitive abilities of elite athletes [ 31 , 57 ] and the possible way to train MF-susceptibility with endurance training [ 32 ]). These features encapsulate the following outcomes (both given by the studies as well as calculated by the author team): mean age and age categories, number of men, number of women and sex distribution (number of women/total sample size), mean mass, height, body fat percentage and BMI, physical fitness level [ 58 , 59 ], peak power output (PPO), VO 2 peak/max, mean years of experience and category of years of experience, mean training frequency (sessions/week) and category of training frequency, mean training load (km/week) and category of training load, and mean training volume (hrs/week) and category of training volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following individual features (and the reason behind their selection) were analysed using a multiple meta-regression: age (chosen based on deterioration of cognitive abilities with old age and the development of the brain during youth [ 53 , 54 ]), biological sex (chosen based on the different ways that men and women cope with mental load [ 36 , 55 ]), anthropometric measures (based on a link between body mass index (BMI)/body fat percentage, a typical measure of health, and cognitive abilities [ 56 ]) and training level (based on the hypothesized cognitive abilities of elite athletes [ 31 , 57 ] and the possible way to train MF-susceptibility with endurance training [ 32 ]). These features encapsulate the following outcomes (both given by the studies as well as calculated by the author team): mean age and age categories, number of men, number of women and sex distribution (number of women/total sample size), mean mass, height, body fat percentage and BMI, physical fitness level [ 58 , 59 ], peak power output (PPO), VO 2 peak/max, mean years of experience and category of years of experience, mean training frequency (sessions/week) and category of training frequency, mean training load (km/week) and category of training load, and mean training volume (hrs/week) and category of training volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Of note, performing prolonged cognitive tasks does not necessarily result in observable decrements in cognitive performance, which was often attributed to a learning effect or an increased compensatory cognitive effort [119][120][121][122].…”
Section: Cognitive Performance Fatiguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a systematic decline in cognitive performance with time-on-task was often attributed to an increased compensatory cognitive effort or to a learning effect that would lead to a performance increase overcoming the performance decline induced by fatigue [119][120][121][122]. In contrast, increases in perceived cognitive fatigue with time-on-task have been shown very consistently across many different conditions (e.g., types and loads of cognitive tasks) [117,118,178,180].…”
Section: Unraveling the Interactions Between Cognitive Performance Fa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations