2023
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4343673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Mergers on Innovations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, the firms are unaware of the avenue type, but they learn about it over time through observable research activities and innovation successes of both themselves and their rivals. Das et al (2024) show that, in this setting, a merger has three effects on innovation. Firstly, due to the substitutability of innovations, a cannibalization effect arises as the second innovation displaces a portion of the gains from the initial innovation.…”
Section: Dynamic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, the firms are unaware of the avenue type, but they learn about it over time through observable research activities and innovation successes of both themselves and their rivals. Das et al (2024) show that, in this setting, a merger has three effects on innovation. Firstly, due to the substitutability of innovations, a cannibalization effect arises as the second innovation displaces a portion of the gains from the initial innovation.…”
Section: Dynamic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…effect of mergers increases as synergies now arise. Das et al (2024) consider a dynamic setting in which two competitors have the opportunity to develop innovations by undertaking investments along a research avenue. The research avenue can be either good or bad; a good research avenue rewards R&D effort with a product innovation at exponentially distributed times, while a bad research avenue never generates an innovation.…”
Section: Dynamic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%