1997
DOI: 10.1080/09593331808616621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Metal Cations on the Kinetics of Limestone Neutralisation of Acid Waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dissolved metals (zinc, magnesium, manganese, and copper) and their salts can decrease the rate of dissolution. Van Tonder and Schutte have shown that the presence of these ions is insignificant when their concentration is not higher than 80−100 mg/dm 3 . Metals precipitate with gypsum, and the ion concentration is not very high.…”
Section: Process Model Of the Fgd Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissolved metals (zinc, magnesium, manganese, and copper) and their salts can decrease the rate of dissolution. Van Tonder and Schutte have shown that the presence of these ions is insignificant when their concentration is not higher than 80−100 mg/dm 3 . Metals precipitate with gypsum, and the ion concentration is not very high.…”
Section: Process Model Of the Fgd Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the conclusion that the copper hydrolysis and precipitation occurs near the surface of the limestone was not supported by any evidence. As noted previously, Van Tonder and Schutte (1997) showed that the rate of ferric precipitation with limestone was fast and occurred in the bulk solution while the rate of aluminium precipitation with limestone was slower and occurred near the surface of the limestone (Van Tonder & Schutte 1997). The results of the Section 3.2 showed that the rate of copper precipitation is relatively fast compared to the dissolution of limestone, which may suggest that the copper precipitation would occur in the bulk solution as was reported in the case of ferric precipitation.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 70%
“…This meant that the ferric precipitation was occurring in the bulk solution, before the metal ions could diffuse to the limestone surface. On the other hand, they believed the much slower aluminium precipitation allowed the metal ions to diffuse to the limestone surface before reacting, forming the inhibitory product layer (Van Tonder & Schutte 1997). This raises an interesting point about precipitation of metals with solids -if the precipitation rate is fast enough that the reaction is diffusion controlled, the solid precipitation reagent is less likely to become passivated which will allow the reaction to continue quickly.…”
Section: ሺሻ ⇄ ା + ି Equation 3-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these techniques are rather costly (Carrera and Robertiello 1993) and therefore, only the neutralisation (i.e. the use of alkali such as NaOH, KOH) is proposed frequently as a cost-effective treatment (Maree and others 1992;Peiffer and others 1997;Vantonder and Schutte 1997;Ziemkiewicz and others 1997;Brown and others 1998). The most common substrate available for sulphate generation in freshwater sediments is pyrite (Evangelou and Zhang 1995;Bonnisselgissinger and others 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%