Sintering Processes 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-5301-8_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of MgO on the Mobility of Grain Boundaries and Pores in Aluminum Oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, analyses intended to identify the stage of sintering that a material has achieved will generally show properties characteristic of more than one stage, or of intermediate stages. That situation is shown in Figure 10 where the data from this work are plotted on a graph of surface area vs. fractional density (1 -porosity) in the fashion of Burke et al (1980). If all surface area reduction occurs through grain coarsening the data would appear as a trend parallel to the surface area axis.…”
Section: Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this reason, analyses intended to identify the stage of sintering that a material has achieved will generally show properties characteristic of more than one stage, or of intermediate stages. That situation is shown in Figure 10 where the data from this work are plotted on a graph of surface area vs. fractional density (1 -porosity) in the fashion of Burke et al (1980). If all surface area reduction occurs through grain coarsening the data would appear as a trend parallel to the surface area axis.…”
Section: Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is also the reason for the smallest pores being filled first. Burke et al (1980) refer to stage I1 as densification because of the decrease in porosity. The transport processes during this stage are both grain boundary and volume diffusion.…”
Section: Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported in literature 6,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] that dopants are usually added to improve the densification and with the selection of some dopants, near-theoretical density can be achieved with enhancement in grain boundary diffusivity at the expense of surface diffusivity and vapour transport. The suppression of exaggerated grain growth in alumina is due to the effect of dopant such that there is increase in surface diffusivity and pore mobility so that pores remain on grain boundaries until these are eliminated.…”
Section: Influence Of Mgo and Sio 2 -Dopants On Grain Growth Grain Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al 2 O 3 -10vol%SiC nanocomposite have been marked by mixing small size of alumina and SiC particles (<100nm), then hot pressed in the range of 1500 to1800°C 1,6 . The important roles of MgO dopant in Al 2 O 3 -SiC nanocomposite are as: (i) lowering the grain boundary mobility 16,17 ; (ii) increasing the surface diffusivity then increasing the pore mobility [18][19][20] ; and (iii) decreasing the grain boundary anisotropy 21 . The objective of this work is to investigate the effects of adding a small amount of MgO (up to1500ppm) to alumina based nanocomposites containing 10vol%SiC particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%