2012
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2013.30.5.497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Microtiming Deviations on the Perception of Groove in Short Rhythms

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
85
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
85
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier theoretical considerations emphasized the roles of subtle timing deviations (microtiming; participatory discrepancies) between players/instruments (Keil & Feld, 1994;Iyer, 2002;Pressing, 2002), but recent studies failed to find a positive correlation between microtiming and perceived groove (Madison et al, 2011;Davies et al, 2013;Frühauf et al, 2013). In fact, as timing deviations increase, perceived groove decreases, particularly among musically trained individuals (Davies et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Earlier theoretical considerations emphasized the roles of subtle timing deviations (microtiming; participatory discrepancies) between players/instruments (Keil & Feld, 1994;Iyer, 2002;Pressing, 2002), but recent studies failed to find a positive correlation between microtiming and perceived groove (Madison et al, 2011;Davies et al, 2013;Frühauf et al, 2013). In fact, as timing deviations increase, perceived groove decreases, particularly among musically trained individuals (Davies et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier theoretical considerations emphasized the roles of subtle timing deviations (microtiming; participatory discrepancies) between players/instruments (Keil & Feld, 1994;Iyer, 2002;Pressing, 2002), but recent studies failed to find a positive correlation between microtiming and perceived groove (Madison et al, 2011;Davies et al, 2013;Frühauf et al, 2013). In fact, as timing deviations increase, perceived groove decreases, particularly among musically trained individuals (Davies et al, 2013). While deviations from strict metronomic timing are inevitable in real music performances, it appears that adaptive timing deviations that serve to decrease asynchronies among individuals stand the best chance of reducing activity in brain areas associated with cognitive control and increasing activity in brain areas associated with socio-emotional processes, reward, and the feeling of being in the groove (Fairhurst et al, 2013;Kokal, Engel, Kirschner, & Keysers, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is based on the premise that a stable beat with less variability and distractions (Davies et al, 2013), as well as with richer temporal information (Madison, 2014) should facilitate synchronization and co-ordination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast and unlike what musicological literature points towards (Keil, 1995), microtiming does not increase groove. The latter was confirmed by a systematic analysis conducted by Davies, Madison, Silva, & Gouyon (2013) on simple rhythms. Madison et al (2011) claim that tempo alone cannot explain groove.…”
Section: Groove In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 59%