2022
DOI: 10.5737/236880763213848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of mind-body exercise on cognitive function in cancer survivors: A systematic review

Abstract: Objective: Cancer-related cognitive impairments experienced by cancer survivors cause many to seek non-pharmacological intereventions to manage these symptoms. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of one such intervention, mind-body exercise (MBE), on cognitive function in cancer survivors. Design: Searches for relevant studies were conducted in four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The Joanna Briggs Institute and Jadad scales were utilized t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 16 quality assessment criteria listed in AMSTAR2 [32], five applicable criteria (31 percent) were met by all 19 included studies. Two meta-analyses [24,27] and two systematic reviews [13,18] met 14 of the 16 criteria, and another four meta-analyses [21,26,28,30] and two systematic reviews [15,19] met 13 of the 16 criteria (see Table 2). The three most violated criteria (Q3 not met in 53%, Q7 not met in 89%, and Q10 not met in 95% of the included studies) do not have a high impact on the research methodological process, but lack the following: (1) a list of excluded studies, (2) the funding of included studies, (3) a statement of the reasons for the study designs included in the reviews.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 16 quality assessment criteria listed in AMSTAR2 [32], five applicable criteria (31 percent) were met by all 19 included studies. Two meta-analyses [24,27] and two systematic reviews [13,18] met 14 of the 16 criteria, and another four meta-analyses [21,26,28,30] and two systematic reviews [15,19] met 13 of the 16 criteria (see Table 2). The three most violated criteria (Q3 not met in 53%, Q7 not met in 89%, and Q10 not met in 95% of the included studies) do not have a high impact on the research methodological process, but lack the following: (1) a list of excluded studies, (2) the funding of included studies, (3) a statement of the reasons for the study designs included in the reviews.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nineteen articles, including seven systematic reviews [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and twelve meta-analyses [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], met the established inclusion criteria and were evaluated (Figure 1, Table 1). Notes: n.r.…”
Section: Search Strategy Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, survivors treated with these lifesaving agents risk a Faustian bargain: the treatment to extend life causes debilitating neuropathology. Survivors seek non-pharmacologic interventions capable of reducing the impact of chemotherapy-induced conditions such as neuropathic pain ( Swarm et al, 2013 ), cognitive impairment (“chemobrain” or “chemofog”) ( Farahani et al, 2022 ), and premature brain aging ( Koppelmans et al, 2012 ; Kesler et al, 2017 ; Du et al, 2022 ; de Ruiter et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%