2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02961-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of MIPS, Headform Condition, and Impact Orientation on Headform Kinematics Across a Range of Impact Speeds During Oblique Bicycle Helmet Impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This layer moves, during an oblique impact, along with the head, thus retarding the moment in which the rotational forces reach the head. Scientific literature report that this system can decrease the rotational acceleration by almost 40% [13]. However, a recent paper [14] has shown that when a biofidelic scalp layer is present, there is no statistical difference between helmet models with and without the MIPS in terms of rotational acceleration, velocity, relative rotation, impact duration and injury risk, indicating that the previous studies-which have not tested anti-rotational acceleration technologies in the presence of a realistic scalp layer-may have exaggerated the contribution of such technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This layer moves, during an oblique impact, along with the head, thus retarding the moment in which the rotational forces reach the head. Scientific literature report that this system can decrease the rotational acceleration by almost 40% [13]. However, a recent paper [14] has shown that when a biofidelic scalp layer is present, there is no statistical difference between helmet models with and without the MIPS in terms of rotational acceleration, velocity, relative rotation, impact duration and injury risk, indicating that the previous studies-which have not tested anti-rotational acceleration technologies in the presence of a realistic scalp layer-may have exaggerated the contribution of such technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%