2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of model structure and data in modeling land conditions in disturbed complex ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disturbance model quality measured using R-Square was similar for Fort Riley (0.344 to 0.569) and Fort Hood (0.337 to 0.637) (Fang et al, 2007). The range in total variance was less for Fort Hood (0.00 to 0.195 variance units) than Fort Riley (0.00 to 0.119 variance units) despite higher levels of predicted disturbance (Fang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Disturbance model quality measured using R-Square was similar for Fort Riley (0.344 to 0.569) and Fort Hood (0.337 to 0.637) (Fang et al, 2007). The range in total variance was less for Fort Hood (0.00 to 0.195 variance units) than Fort Riley (0.00 to 0.119 variance units) despite higher levels of predicted disturbance (Fang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Anderson et al (2005) using the same methodology, GIS data and field data, found that incorporating TM imagery improved model performance. Fang et al (2007) subsequently demonstrated that incorporating interaction terms in the model could improve model performance. Fang et al (2007) also demonstrated that the amount and quality of data available for model development significantly affected model predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation