The 1991 National Roofing Contractors Association Annual Roofing Survey predicts increases in recover, the reroofing practice of installing a new roof over an existing failed roof. For 1992, the survey estimates that $5¼ billion will be spent on recover. Market trends suggest that recover will become an increasingly more popular option in reroofing. The most controversial aspect of recover pertains to the presence of water in the failed roof. For recover to be a viable reroofing option, this water must have a means of escaping the roof system; entrapped water in the roof would lead to the eventual mechanical failure of the deck and fasteners The rate that water can be driven from a roof system will dictate whether recover can be considered as a reroofing option for that system A combined heat and mass transfer mathematical model has been used to simulate the sensitivity of climate on drying times of a simple roof system. The results are compared to a baseline case where the roof system is held at isothermal conditions. Significant differences in drying times were computed, ranging from 300 days for Miami, FL to 930 days for Bismarck, ND. Three of the four climates that were modeled required drying times in excess of the isothermal case; the U.S climate tends to extend the required drying times for a large portion of the country.