The effect of Muscle Energy Techniques versus cross (X) technique kinesio taping to treat chronic low back dysfunction

Elshinnawy, Ahmed Metwally; Elrazik, Reda kotb Abd; Elatief, Emad Eldin Mohamed Abd

doi:10.12968/ijtr.2017.0038

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The same application was made on the other side of the spine. Finally, the third patch was applied transversely to the rst two with a tension correction of 70-80% using the musculoskeletal method, then the bases of the patch were glued on both sides without generating tension [25,26].…”

Section: Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of Kinesio taping on pain intensity and soft tissue mechanical properties in non- specific low back pain

Berger-Pasternak

Sipko

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To assess the effects of Kinesio Taping (KT), with or without tension, and post-isometric muscle relaxation (PIR) on pain intensity and the mechanical properties of myofascial tissues in chronic low back pain (LBP) patients. Methods Study participants (n = 64), aged 20 to 60, were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups. The numerical rating scale (NRS) assessed pain intensity at rest, and the MyotonPRO© measured tension, stiffness, and relaxation in the erector spinae on both sides of the lumbar spine. The examinations were undertaken before the intervention, post-interventions, and at a seven-day follow-up. Results Pain level was reduced for all groups (F (4, 116) = 39.2010, p < 0.01). In addition, post hoc analysis of the KT group showed significant increases in the tension and stiffness of the erector spinae and significantly decreased relaxation between the pre-intervention and follow-up measurements, but only on the non-dominant side (p < 0.01). Conclusions Assuming that the lack of asymmetry in muscle tension, stiffness, and relaxation is a normative value, it can be interpreted that the applied interventions were insufficient. As such, KT should be considered a complementary method of pain reduction in conjunction with conventional physiotherapy in LBP patients.

show abstract

Section: Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of Kinesio taping on pain intensity and soft tissue mechanical properties in non- specific low back pain

Berger-Pasternak

Sipko

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There were twenty-three RCTs related to conditions of the lumbar spine and abdominal wall, with all but one assessing KT (Appendix 2 File: Appendix 2G). One addressed KT for acute low back pain [136], two investigated KT for back pain in the setting of lumbar disc herniation [137,138], two investigated KT for pregnancy related low back pain [139,140], one RCT investigated postpartum diastasis recti abdominis [141], and sixteen investigated KT for chronic low back pain, [142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157]. One study evaluated rigid taping for sacroiliac joint dysfunction [158].…”

Section: Lumbar Spinementioning

confidence: 99%

Taping for conditions of the musculoskeletal system: an evidence map review

Cupler

Alrwaily

Polakowski³

et al. 2020

Chiropr Man Therap

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Taping is a common treatment modality used by many rehabilitation providers. Several types of tapes and taping methods are used in the treatment of musculoskeletal dysfunction and pain. Purpose To summarize and map the evidence related to taping methods used for various joints and conditions of the musculoskeletal system, and to provide clinicians and researchers with a user-friendly reference with organized evidence tables. Data sources The PEDro, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, PubMed, and PROSPERO databases were searched from inception through October 31, 2019. Study selection Eligible studies were selected by two independent reviewers and included either systematic reviews (SRs) or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and included a musculoskeletal complaint using a clinical outcome measure. Data extraction Data was extracted by two investigators independently. Risk of bias and quality were assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) for SRs or the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for RCTs. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019122857). Data synthesis Twenty-five musculoskeletal conditions were summarized from forty-one SRs and 127 RCTs. There were 6 SRs and 49 RCTs for spinal conditions. Kinesio tape was the most common type of tape considered. Four evidence tables representing the synthesized SRs and RCTs were produced and organized by body region per condition. Limitations Inclusion of only English language studies. Also, the heterogeneous nature of the included studies prevented a meta-analysis. Conclusions There is mixed quality evidence of effectiveness for the different types of taping methods for different body regions and conditions. All of the SRs and RCTs found during our search of the taping literature have been organized into a series of appendices. A synthesis of the results have been placed in evidence tables that may serve as a useful guide to clinicians and researchers.

show abstract

“…It can be used to improve joint mobility by influencing the dysfunctional soft tissues and to relax tight tens musculature, spasms, or fibrotic changes. It can help increasing muscle strength, increasing range of motion (ROM) and decreasing edema (Elshinnawy et al, 2019). Although the limited number of high quality studies available to reach conclusive opinion (Franke et al, 2015), MET has been shown to be effective in reducing pain (Phadke et al, 2016), improving ROM, and functional level (Patel et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pilate mat exercise versus muscle energy technique on chronic non specific low back pain

Gendy

Hekal

Kadah

et al. 2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Many studies have been performed to evaluate the best physical therapy technique for treating chronic nonspecific low back pain. Pilate exercises and muscle energy techniques showed favorable results in many trials. Yet, no comparisons were conducted to compare their effects. Purpose: To compare between the effects of pilate mat exercise (PME) and Muscle energy technique (MET) on pain intensity, functional disability, trunk range of motion, and flexibility in patients with chronic non specific low back pain. Subjects: seventy-eight patients diagnosed, by their orthopedist, with chronic non specific low back pain participated in this study. Methods: Patients were divided randomly into three groups: Pilate group: consisted of 29 patients who received PME and standard treatment, MET group: consisted of 29 patients who received MET treatment and standard treatment, Control group: consisted of 29 patients who received standard treatment only. Interventions were performed for 12 sessions (3 sessions/ week) over a period of four weeks. Outcomes were assessed at the beginning and at the end of the fourth week using visual analogue scale for pain intensity, V-sit and reach test (VSR) for flexibility of hamstring and lower back muscles.

show abstract

The effect of Muscle Energy Techniques versus cross (X) technique kinesio taping to treat chronic low back dysfunction

Cited by 5 publications

References 18 publications

The effects of Kinesio taping on pain intensity and soft tissue mechanical properties in non- specific low back pain

The effects of Kinesio taping on pain intensity and soft tissue mechanical properties in non- specific low back pain

Taping for conditions of the musculoskeletal system: an evidence map review

Pilate mat exercise versus muscle energy technique on chronic non specific low back pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About