2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4573.2006.00035.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Mutton, Goat, Beef and Rabbit‐meat Species and State of Rigor on Some Technological Parameters

Abstract: The research consists of two steps with the goal to investigate the relationship between meat species (mutton, goat, beef and rabbit) in prerigor and postrigor stages in respect to emulsification capacity (EC), water‐holding capacity (WHC) and cooking loss (CL) parameters and the effect of rigor state of species on these parameters. For this purpose, immediately after slaughter and deboning, meat parts were assigned to both pre‐ and postrigor analyses. Tissue was ground, and then mixed to obtain homogeneous me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cooking loss of the different meat used in this study were similar (P>0.05) to each other (Table 3). Chevon was observed to have a higher ability to retain its intrinsic water during cooking which corroborates the report of [18] that goat meat and mutton have higher water holding capacity in both pre and post rigor states than beef. It should be noted that meat with higher water holding capacity is more desired because it will result in a higher product yield.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Raw Meat Typessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The cooking loss of the different meat used in this study were similar (P>0.05) to each other (Table 3). Chevon was observed to have a higher ability to retain its intrinsic water during cooking which corroborates the report of [18] that goat meat and mutton have higher water holding capacity in both pre and post rigor states than beef. It should be noted that meat with higher water holding capacity is more desired because it will result in a higher product yield.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Raw Meat Typessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The higher emulsifying capacity of meat from grasscutters fed the 2000 kcalME/kg diet is related to the higher protein content of the meat of grasscutters on that diet. The higher content of salt-soluble proteins of meats have been reported to effect higher emulsifying capacities in meat emulsions (Forrest et al, 1975;Karakaya, 2006).…”
Section: Emulsifying Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable meat emulsions are produced from protein, fat and moisture, with protein serving as an emulsifying agent (Karakaya, 2006). The most practical application of meat emulsion is found in the preparation of sausages.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cooked meat was cooled down for 12 h at +4ºC and the surface was dried before it was weighed. CL percentage was calculated with the following formula [15,16] . CL (%) = [(weight of raw steak after thawing -weight of cooked steak)/weight of raw steak after thawing] × 100.…”
Section: Calculation Of the CLmentioning
confidence: 99%