The effect of nasal and oral breathing on airway collapsibility in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: Computational fluid dynamics analyses

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of breathing route on the collapsibility of the pharyngeal airway in patients with obstructive sleep apnea by using computational fluid dynamics technology. MethodsThis study examined Japanese men with obstructive sleep apnea. Computed tomography scans of the nose and pharynx were taken during nasal breathing with closed mouth, nasal breathing with open mouth, and oral breathing while they were awake. Three-dimensional reconstructed stereolithography models and digital unstructured grid models were created and airflow simulations were performed using computational fluid dynamics software. ResultsAirflow velocity was significantly higher during oral breathing than during nasal breathing with open or closed mouth. No significant difference in maximum velocity was noted between nasal breathing with closed and open mouth. However, airflow during nasal breathing with open mouth was slow but rapidly sped up at the lower level of the velopharynx, and then spread and became a disturbed, unsteady stream. In contrast, airflow during nasal breathing with closed mouth gradually sped up at the oropharyngeal level without spreading or disturbance. Negative static pressure during oral breathing was significantly decreased; however, there were no significant differences between nasal breathing with closed or open mouth. ConclusionsComputational fluid dynamics results during nasal and oral breathing revealed that oral breathing is the primary condition leading to pharyngeal airway collapse based on the

A preoperative predictive study of advantages of airway changes after maxillomandibular advancement surgery using computational fluid dynamics analysis

“…Our previous studies [ 19 , 20 , 23 ] demonstrated that CFD simulations could largely reproduce patients’ actual respiratory flow dynamics. This study suggests that CFD can be used to analyze respiration air flows in areas that cannot be measured by rhinomanometric methods, i.e.…”

The Effect of Oral and Nasal Breathing on Pain Perception during Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

“…Variables included tissue distensibility 10 , speed of injection 11 , patient characteristics 12 , psychological aspects 4 and temperature 13 . Simple and non-medical measures to reduce stress level during dental procedures are preferably adopted [6][7][8] . Nasal breathing is a natural process than oral breathing.…”

“…Generally oral breather patients are irritable, stressed out and fatigued whereas nasal breathers have active parasympathetic system than oral breathesr 5 . Also, there is less amount of endogenous epinephrine released in nasal breathers which may contribute to lower anxiety and pain perception 5,6 . Studies have revealed that oral breather has more pain perception than nasal breather during LA in dentistry [5][6][7][8][9] In light of the above, this study was aimed at observing the difference in pain perception during IANB in oral and nasal breather.…”

Breathing Re-Education and Phenotypes of Sleep Apnea: A Review

“…Fitzpatrick et al examined healthy subjects to compare nasal and oral breathing routes. The study found that when breathing was through the mouth, upper airway resistance during sleep was 2.5 times greater than when breathing was through the nose [ 72 ]. Hsu et al reported that mouth breathing was strongly associated with greater oxygen desaturation and more significant upper airway collapse.…”