2021
DOI: 10.36311/jhgd.v31.12299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of negationism on public health

Abstract: Negacionism refers to the choice to deny a scientifically proven reality, which can reduce life expectancy and quality of life. Within this context, the uncontrolled trajectory of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil has generated great concern due to the lack of consensus on how to manage the pandemic in a scenario of denial of the seriousness of the disease by the government, since on August 2nd, 2021, there are 556,437 Brazilians killed due to the disease. The denial of COVID-19 and the immunizing agent is anoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, none examined emotional reactions to non-compliance to safety precautions during the pandemic—an important issue that socio-psychological research can help to illuminate. Although most people generally support public health precautions [ 38 ], health-protective behaviors (e.g., COVID-19 regulations) pose a “social dilemma” as they limit the freedom of the individual, but they pursue the cause of collective safety [ 23 ]. This suggests to us that, for effective pandemic management in terms of individuals’ responses (preventive behaviors), communities should negotiate social norms to find a balance between freedom and constraint, or “tight–loose ambidexterity” [ 10 ], depending on the level of threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, none examined emotional reactions to non-compliance to safety precautions during the pandemic—an important issue that socio-psychological research can help to illuminate. Although most people generally support public health precautions [ 38 ], health-protective behaviors (e.g., COVID-19 regulations) pose a “social dilemma” as they limit the freedom of the individual, but they pursue the cause of collective safety [ 23 ]. This suggests to us that, for effective pandemic management in terms of individuals’ responses (preventive behaviors), communities should negotiate social norms to find a balance between freedom and constraint, or “tight–loose ambidexterity” [ 10 ], depending on the level of threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerous crises, ranging from the COVID-19 pandemic to escalating inflation, including the instability of wars and natural disasters, have greatly affected the ability to achieve the agreed goals, reducing international financing, especially for less developed countries [15][16][17] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings indicate the epidemiological pattern of the number of new cases and mortality in the municipality studied. However, even with the optimistic perspective of immunization efficiency, it is far from being effective for the population of the country, which once again highlights non-pharmacological measures as important for reducing the number of cases and deaths 38,39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%