1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf02182920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of nitrate concentration in a flowing solution system on growth and nitrate uptake of twoPlantago species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…coinciding with the maximum RGR value. The maximum IM of the N value was lower than that reported for the grassland herbs Plantago lanceolata and P. major (Freijsen and Otten, 1984).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…coinciding with the maximum RGR value. The maximum IM of the N value was lower than that reported for the grassland herbs Plantago lanceolata and P. major (Freijsen and Otten, 1984).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Since nitrogen is acquired solely by the root system, an increase in the root-to-shoot ratio thus allows these plants to increase their chances of obtaining nitrogen to sustain growth. Many experiments have confirmed an increase in root growth versus shoot growth in response to nitrogen in a wide range of species, including maize [24], cotton [25], soya bean [25][26][27], rape [28], Plantago [29], tobacco [30,31], birch [32,33] and Arabidopsis [34,35]. Split root experiments again demonstrate a critical role for the shoot, and suggest that the N-depleted status of the shoot results in promotive systemic signalling.…”
Section: Root System Responses To Environmental Nitrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these results it was concluded that P. lanceolata reacts more flexibly to sudden changes in nutrient level, and therefore may be better adapted to a fluctuating environment than P. major, which probably prefers a more stable habitat. When grown in a flowing nutrient solution, with a nitrate concentration of 9.5/~M, growth of P. major was not hampered as compared to that at 7.5 mM nitrate, whereas growth of P. lanceolata was reduced at 9.5#M nitrate (Freijsen and Otten, 1984). However, when grown with an intermittent supply of 25/~M nitrate (one day with nitrate, alternating one or two days without), growth of P. major was reduced more than that of P. lanceolata (Freijsen and Otten, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Also the decrease in nitrate concentration and the increase in sugar concentration were similar in both species. Summarizing, P. major's plastic response to nitrate stress seems more appropriate than that of P. lanceolata (continuation of root growth, stronger increase of NUE, less loss of leaves), in strong contrast with the reaction to sudden stresses as applied by Freijsen and Otten (1984), Stulen et al (1981a and b) and Lambers et al (1981a and b), where P. lanceolata adjusted more adequately than P. major.…”
Section: Nitrogen Depletion In Plantago 203mentioning
confidence: 91%