The effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on the duration of non-invasive respiratory support in late preterm and term infants with transient tachypnea of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial

Baldan, Emre; Varal, İpek Güney; Doğan, Peli̇n; Cizmeci, Mehmet Nevzat

doi:10.1007/s00431-023-05128-4

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most studies published in the literature report that nHFOV is a safe NIV mode [10,62], with beneficial results and no increase in adverse effects [13,19,51,55,63]. Analysis of the part of our survey evaluating the secondary effects of nHFOV showed that leaks at the interface level (90.9%), thick secretions (81.8%), and secondary obstruction of the upper airway (63.9%) were the most common adverse effects noted by clinicians (Table 3).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Use in Romanian Neonatal Intensive Care Units – Results of a Recent Survey

OGNEAN,

Bivoleanu,

Cucerea

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) has emerged as an effective initial and rescue noninvasive respiratory support mode for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Multiple noninvasive respiratory support modes are currently available in Romania, but little is known about nHFOV use in Romanian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We aimed to identify the usage extent and clinical application of nHFOV in Romania. A structured web-based questionnaire was designed to find the rate of nHFOV use and knowledge of this new method of noninvasive respiratory support in Romanian level III NICUs. The questionnaire was addressed to the leaders of all level III Romanian NICUs. Using multiple-choice, open-ended, and yes/no questions, we collected information on the NICU’s size, noninvasive respiratory support modes used, nHFOV use, indications, settings, nasal interfaces, secondary effects, and equipment used. Descriptive statistics and comparisons were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. A total of 21/23 (91.3%) leaders from level III NICUs (median [IQR] number of beds of 10 [10-17.5]) responded to the survey. The most frequently used noninvasive ventilation modes were CPAP mode on mechanical ventilators (76.2%), followed by NIPPV (76.2%), heated, humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) (61.9%), and nHFOV (11/21 units; 52.4%); 5/11 units reported frequent nHFOV use (in 2 or more newborns/month) in both term and preterm infants. The main indications reported for nHFOV use were CPAP failure (90.9%), hypercapnia (81.8%), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (72.7%). 10/11 units reported setting a mean airway pressure (MAP) equal to the CPAP level plus 1-2 cmH2O on rescue nHFOV after CPAP failure. Both dedicated equipment (45.5%) and hybrid ventilators (63.6%) were used for nHFOV delivery, with face/nasal masks and short binasal prongs being the most commonly used nasal interfaces (90.9% and 72.7%, respectively). Air leaks at the interface level (90.9%), thick secretions (81.8%), and airway obstruction (63.6%) were the most frequently mentioned adverse effects of nHFOV; none of the units mentioned pneumothorax as an adverse effect. Only 3 of the NICUs had a written protocol for nHFOV use. Initial, minimum, and maximum amplitude and initial and minimum MAP settings used were significantly higher with hybrid ventilators as compared to dedicated equipment (p<0.05). Most units not yet using nHFOV cited lack of equipment, experience, training, or insufficient information and evidence for the clinical use and outcome of nHFOV use in neonates as the main reasons for not implementing this noninvasive respiratory mode. Our survey showed that nHFOV is already used in more than half of the Romanian level III NICUs to support term and preterm infants with respiratory distress despite a lack of consensus regarding indications and settings during nHFOV. A need for training for nHFOV use was identified, and efforts are needed at the national level to develop courses and training sessions, including using simulation workshops, to offer more information on optimal nHFOV use in clinical practice.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Use in Romanian Neonatal Intensive Care Units – Results of a Recent Survey

OGNEAN,

Bivoleanu,

Cucerea

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Proportion of confluent B-Lines predicts respiratory support in term infants shortly after birth

Lin,

Zhang,

Wang

et al. 2024

Respir Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To develop and evaluate the predictive value of a simplified lung ultrasound (LUS) method for forecasting respiratory support in term infants. Methods This observational, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study was conducted in a tertiary academic hospital between June and December 2023. A total of 361 neonates underwent LUS examination within 1 h of birth. The proportion of each LUS sign was utilized to predict their respiratory outcomes and compared with the LUS score model. After identifying the best predictive LUS sign, simplified models were created based on different scan regions. The optimal simplified model was selected by comparing its accuracy with both the full model and the LUS score model. Results After three days of follow-up, 91 infants required respiratory support, while 270 remained healthy. The proportion of confluent B-lines demonstrated high predictive accuracy for respiratory support, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 89.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.5-93.7%). The optimal simplified model involved scanning the R/L 1–4 region, yielding an AUC of 87.5% (95% CI: 82.6-92.3%). Both the full model and the optimal simplified model exhibited higher predictive accuracy compared to the LUS score model. The optimal cut-off value for the simplified model was determined to be 15.9%, with a sensitivity of 76.9% and specificity of 91.9%. Conclusions The proportion of confluent B-lines in LUS can effectively predict the need for respiratory support in term infants shortly after birth and offers greater reliability than the LUS score model. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-024-02944-6.

show abstract

Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Use in Romanian Neonatal Intensive Care Units—The Results of a Recent Survey

Ognean,

Bivoleanu,

Cucerea

et al. 2024

Children

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) has emerged as an effective initial and rescue noninvasive respiratory support mode for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); however, little is known about nHFOV use in Romanian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Objectives: We aimed to identify the usage extent and clinical application of nHFOV in Romania. Methods: A structured web-based questionnaire was designed to find the rate of nHFOV use and knowledge of this new method of noninvasive respiratory support in Romanian level III NICUs. Using multiple-choice, open-ended, and yes/no questions, we collected information on the NICU’s size, noninvasive respiratory support modes used, nHFOV use, indications, settings, nasal interfaces, secondary effects, and equipment used. Descriptive statistics and comparisons were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Results: A total of 21/23 (91.3%) leaders from level III NICUs (median [IQR] number of beds of 10 [10–17.5]) responded to the survey. The most frequently used noninvasive ventilation modes were CPAP mode on mechanical ventilators (76.2%), followed by NIPPV (76.2%); heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) (61.9%); and nHFOV (11/21 units; 52.4%). A total of 5/11 units reported frequent nHFOV use (in two or more newborns/month) in both term and preterm infants. The main indications reported for nHFOV use were CPAP failure (90.9%), hypercapnia (81.8%), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (72.7%). Face/nasal masks and short binasal prongs are the most commonly used nasal interfaces (90.9% and 72.7%, respectively). Air leaks at the interface level (90.9%), thick secretions (81.8%), and airway obstruction (63.6%) were the most frequently mentioned adverse effects of nHFOV. Only three of the NICUs had a written protocol for nHFOV use. Most units not yet using nHFOV cited lack of equipment, experience, training, or insufficient information and evidence for the clinical use and outcome of nHFOV use in neonates as the main reasons for not implementing this noninvasive respiratory mode. Conclusions: Our survey showed that nHFOV is already used in more than half of the Romanian level III NICUs to support term and preterm infants with respiratory distress despite a lack of consensus regarding indications and settings during nHFOV.

show abstract

The effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on the duration of non-invasive respiratory support in late preterm and term infants with transient tachypnea of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial

Cited by 3 publications

References 28 publications

Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Use in Romanian Neonatal Intensive Care Units – Results of a Recent Survey

Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Use in Romanian Neonatal Intensive Care Units – Results of a Recent Survey

Proportion of confluent B-Lines predicts respiratory support in term infants shortly after birth

Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Use in Romanian Neonatal Intensive Care Units—The Results of a Recent Survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About