1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5273(87)90182-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of oral cimetidine on total and unbound serum lidocaine concentrations in patients with suspected myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding may have been influenced by the numerous concomitant drugs received by patients in the study. Berk et al (1987) reported that oral cimetidine increased the total and unbound lidocaine concentrations in 6 patients who were receiving continuous infusions oflidocaine. However, one major flaw of this study was the lack of a control patient population.…”
Section: Antiarrhythmicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding may have been influenced by the numerous concomitant drugs received by patients in the study. Berk et al (1987) reported that oral cimetidine increased the total and unbound lidocaine concentrations in 6 patients who were receiving continuous infusions oflidocaine. However, one major flaw of this study was the lack of a control patient population.…”
Section: Antiarrhythmicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cimetidine increased lidocaine concentrations in 6 healthy volunteers; 5 of these experienced symptoms of toxicity (Feely et al 1982). Berk et al (1987) reported that altered protein binding in patients with myocardial infarction reduced the clinical relevance of increased total lidocaine concentrations. In these patients, total lidocaine concentrations increased by 24% but unbound lidocaine increased by only 9% at 24h after cimetidine administration.…”
Section: Antiarrhythmicsmentioning
confidence: 99%