2018
DOI: 10.1016/s2095-3119(17)61834-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of ozone and drought on the photosynthetic performance of canola

Abstract: Canola plants were fumigated in open-top chambers with ozone (O 3) (120 ppb) under well-watered (WW) and water-stressed (WS) conditions for 4 weeks. Non-fumigated plants were also studied to facilitate comparison between treatments for the same week and over time. Therefore, the treatments were: WW, WW-O 3 , WS and WS-O 3. The fast chlorophyll a fluorescence transients OJIP for the four treatments emitted upon illumination of dark-adapted leaves were measured after week 1, 2, 3, 4 and analysed by the JIP-test … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under drought conditions, the decrease was significant only in wheat plants. This indicates that the effect of O 3 was minor under drought conditions in canola plants [53]. The reduction of the PI total was caused by the efficiency with which an electron from the intersystem electron carriers was transferred to reduce end electron acceptors at the PSI acceptor side, as well as the decline of the density of reaction centers, which, taking into account that φ Po remained nearly unchanged, represented an increase of the functional PSII antenna size [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under drought conditions, the decrease was significant only in wheat plants. This indicates that the effect of O 3 was minor under drought conditions in canola plants [53]. The reduction of the PI total was caused by the efficiency with which an electron from the intersystem electron carriers was transferred to reduce end electron acceptors at the PSI acceptor side, as well as the decline of the density of reaction centers, which, taking into account that φ Po remained nearly unchanged, represented an increase of the functional PSII antenna size [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of drought and heat stress on photosynthetic parameters has been extensively studied and different plants were considered in this respect (Bahrami et al, 2019 ; Goltsev et al, 2016 ; Kalaji et al, 2017 ; Lazár, 2015 ; Lichtenthaler et al, 2005 ; Maliba et al, 2018 ; Osipova et al, 2019 ; Oukarroum et al, 2012 ; Singh et al, 2019 ; Xue et al, 2017 ). However, the comparative analysis of the interactive effect at different intensities of drought and heat stress on photosynthetic parameters' response and other biochemical parameters across temperature regimes remained untouched in the cited studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%