The effect of palliative care intervention program on the quality of life among Jordanian caregivers of cancer patients

Younis, Mohammad K. Bani; Al-Rawashdeh, Ahmad; Alnjadat, Rafi

doi:10.1080/01621424.2019.1661325

Cited by 6 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thirteen trials 38,42–44,46,48–50,52,54,56,57,59 reported low attrition bias by reporting on losses to follow‐up after and indicating reasons for losses. In this review, high reporting bias was observed in five studies 40,42,51,53,59 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…Length of individual contacts lasted between 15 min 57 to 2 h 50 . Many of the interventions were delivered via face‐to‐face contact in a hospital, often supplemented with telephone follow‐ups, 35,39,42,44,49,51,54,56,59 websites 38,48 and home visits 53 . Thirteen of the interventions were nurse‐led interventions 34–36,39,40,43,47,50,52–54,59 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thirteen studies reported on the effect of PEI on QoL 35–37,39–41,45,48,51,55,56,58,59 . Pooled analysis was performed for 11 studies that provided relevant statistics (Figure 4A,B).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pooled analysis was performed for 11 studies that provided relevant statistics (Figure 4A,B). 36,37,39,41,45,48,51,55,56,58,59 The pooled statistical analysis of these studies 36,37,39,41,45,48,51,55,56,58,59 with a total of 1097 participants showed that PEI was significantly superior to other standard interventions in improving caregiver's QoL (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.24–0.93; p = 0.0009; I 2 = 87%) in the immediate post‐intervention period (Figure 4A). The pooled effect of six studies 36,37,41,56,58,59 showed a significant small effect on caregiver's QoL (SMD 0.39, 95% CI = −0.00–0.77, p = 0.05; I 2 = 81%) in the long‐term follow‐up usually from 4 weeks to 8 months (Figure 4B).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions on caregiver‐oriented outcomes in caregivers of adult cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Cancer caregiving can result in increased psychosocial distress and poor health‐related quality of life (QOL). Psychoeducation has been shown to be effective in enhancing caregiving‐oriented outcomes. A systematic assessment of the overall effect of psychoeducational intervention (PEI) and identification of individual intervention characteristics that may contribute to the effectiveness of PEI is needed. Methods For this meta‐analysis, relevant articles were identified through electronic databases using key search terms and their medical subject heading such as “family caregiver,” “cancer,” and “psychoeducational intervention.” Results Twenty‐eight controlled trials with 3876 participants were included. PEIs had beneficial effect on depression (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] −0.26; 95% CI = −0.50 to −0.01, p < 0.04), anxiety (SMD −0.41; 95% CI = −0.82 to 0.01, p < 0.05), caregiver burden (SMD −0.84; 95% CI = −1.22 to −0.46, p < 0.0001) and QOL (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.24–0.93; p < 0.0009) at the immediate post‐intervention period. At longer‐term follow‐up, the effectiveness of PEI was maintained on QOL (SMD 0.39, 95% CI = −0.00 to −0.77, p < 0.05), and anxiety (SMD −0.57; 95% CI = −1.09 to −0.06, p < 0.03). Moderation analysis showed that intervention characteristics such as studies conducted in high‐income countries, group intervention and studies that focused on specific and mixed cancers explain some of the high variations observed among the included studies. Conclusions PEI may benefit caregivers of cancer patients through the significant effects on caregiver burden, QOL, anxiety, and depression. The findings from the moderation analysis may be important for the design of future interventions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thirteen studies reported on the effect of PEI on QoL 35–37,39–41,45,48,51,55,56,58,59 . Pooled analysis was performed for 11 studies that provided relevant statistics (Figure 4A,B).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions on caregiver‐oriented outcomes in caregivers of adult cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Los niveles de calidad de vida en los cuidadores de personas con cáncer avanzado en cuidados paliativos en este estudio, se alejaron de los niveles óptimos; el puntaje total de calidad de vida se ubicó entre 116,36 y 122,35 puntos de 160 posibles. Los resultados de este estudio, difieren en gran medida de los reportados otros estudios realizados en India (15) , en el que se halló una media de calidad de vida de 63,36 (DE: 15,73); en Alemania (16) en un estudio de intervención con cuidadores de adultos con cáncer en fase paliativa, en el que la línea base de calidad de vida fue de 61 (DE: 12) y otro estudio también en Jordania (17) con cuidadores familiares de pacientes con cáncer avanzado, que reportó una media de calidad de vida de 82,80 puntos. Los tres estudios referidos encontrados muestran una media muy inferior a la reportada por este estudio.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Calidad de vida de cuidadores familiares de personas con cáncer que reciben atención de cuidados paliativos

Holgín

Arias-Rojas

Carreño-Moreno

2021

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMEN Objetivo Describir la calidad de vida y factores relacionados, en una muestra de cuidadores colombianos de personas con cáncer en cuidados paliativos. Método Estudio descriptivo correlacional de corte transversal, con 208 cuidadores familiares de personas con cáncer en cuidados paliativos ambulatorios en Medellín-Colombia. Se usó el instrumento de calidad de vida en enfermedades que amenazan la vida – versión cuidador familiar (QOLLTI-F). Resultados La calidad de vida puntuó entre 116,36 y 122,35 (IC95%). Las dimensiones con las puntuaciones más bajas fueron del estado del paciente (2,4–3,2, IC95%), estado del cuidador (36,2–39,9, IC 95%) y medio ambiente (14,4–15,7, IC95%). La edad del paciente, edad del cuidador e índice Karnofsky, presentaron una correlación positiva, de débil a moderada y significativa con la calidad de vida del cuidador. Las horas diarias dedicadas a cuidar, presentaron una correlación débil, negativa y significativa con la calidad de vida total y la dimensión estado del cuidador. Conclusión Se requiere desarrollar intervenciones para mejorar la calidad de vida de los cuidadores de personas con cáncer avanzado en fase paliativa, considerando la importancia de acciones de relevo y manejo de la dependencia funcional del paciente.

show abstract

Effects of psychosocial interventions on psychological outcomes among caregivers of advanced cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lee

Chen

Lee

et al. 2021

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of palliative care intervention program on the quality of life among Jordanian caregivers of cancer patients

Cited by 6 publications

References 21 publications

The effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions on caregiver‐oriented outcomes in caregivers of adult cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions on caregiver‐oriented outcomes in caregivers of adult cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Calidad de vida de cuidadores familiares de personas con cáncer que reciben atención de cuidados paliativos

Effects of psychosocial interventions on psychological outcomes among caregivers of advanced cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About